Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Important Point about Weiner/Abedin E-Mail Issue (VANITY)
Self | 10/29/16 | Alberta's Child

Posted on 10/29/2016 10:18:34 AM PDT by Alberta's Child

Sorry for the vanity, but I wanted to get this out there in its own thread rather than go through and post it as a response on all of the threads on this subject.

A number of media outlets have gone to great lengths today to point out that the e-mails in question that led to yesterday's announcement "weren't sent to or from Hillary Clinton." I've seen variations of this theme from many of these reports.

It's important to note that this particular point is irrelevant, and the fact that there is so much focus on it tells me that the people peddling this nonsense know exactly where Clinton's legal exposure lies.

The statement the media is making here only relates to specific e-mails sent to or from an e-mail account for Huma Abedin and/or Anthony Weiner. However, this doesn't account for the fact that many of these e-mails were forwarded from other sources. Every e-mail I've seen from Wikileaks, KimDotCom, and the redacted files from the Judicial Watch lawsuit (just to cite three examples) are printed or scanned versions of e-mail correspondence that include a long e-mail chain with other senders shown for prior messages in the same chain. Some of these were clearly sent by Hillary Clinton (hrc22@clintonemail.com and hrod17@clintonemail, for example).

In other words, it's not just the content of the e-mail messages to/from Weiner or Abedin that is at issue here ... it's the evidence contained in all the other prior e-mails that show up in a chain of messages that was forwarded to one of these two mutants.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Conspiracy; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: abedin; comey; dikileaks; hillary; huma; nowwithmorevanity; weiner; yetanothervanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
Sorry for a long vanity post, but I wanted to get this out there because I'll be out for several hours and won't have a chance to post on other threads where I've been active since yesterday. Thank you!
1 posted on 10/29/2016 10:18:34 AM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child


2 posted on 10/29/2016 10:20:13 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

People saying this have no idea whether the emails were to or from Hillary Clinton. It’s wishful thinking at its best, aside from the fact that it’s not totally pertinent.


3 posted on 10/29/2016 10:20:39 AM PDT by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

4 posted on 10/29/2016 10:22:03 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Go ahead, bite the Big Apple ... don't mind the maggots.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

That top one is perfect!


5 posted on 10/29/2016 10:22:28 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

I thought Comey himself said as much in a carefully crafted statement. I may be wrong about that ...


6 posted on 10/29/2016 10:22:32 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Go ahead, bite the Big Apple ... don't mind the maggots.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

He says the FBI doesn’t know what’s in the emails. I call BS. They must know plenty, or this wouldn’t be happening. They doubtless have a lot more investigating to do, however, and I don’t expect answers between now and election day. Smoke, but no answers.


7 posted on 10/29/2016 10:24:31 AM PDT by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Wondering if this has anything to do with Obama. He communicated through her private server. Huma could have forwarded some of his messages to Weiner. That’s a huge national security issue.


8 posted on 10/29/2016 10:24:35 AM PDT by Galtoid ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

“Some of these were clearly sent by Hillary Clinton”

You nailed it!!!! I was thinking the same thing last night when I realized that every Clinton hack on TV was peddling the same trash. And I was going nuts waiting for someone,anyone...to make your point.

The follow up argument they started late last night was that Huma was only forwarding the emails so she could print them, because the Beast wanted it that way. Guess what...that’s illegal...so now we have tens of thousands of emails housed, not only at the Beast’s home, but atHuma’s home as well.


9 posted on 10/29/2016 10:24:45 AM PDT by MaxistheBest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Laundering emails/information /secrets

It never made sense why Clinton had her own server until now. It was a
Hop or relay server. If those messages were all forwarded to other domains from Clintonmail.com. If you forward them enough then nobody knows where to look if they are investigating your criminal dealings.


10 posted on 10/29/2016 10:25:02 AM PDT by DOGHEAD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

First, how does the media know what the emails say or who they’re from? Second, human told the FBI that she forwarded her gov emails to her yahoo email
So they’ve found something new.


11 posted on 10/29/2016 10:26:07 AM PDT by Terry Mross (This country will fail to exist in my lifetime. And I'm gettin' up there in age.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Huma forwarding emails to her husband...”shop talk” ensues about her tyrannical boss’s illegality.

Everybody needs to rant now and again.

I can’t imagine that any privilege that might be afforded to a married couples communications would extend to cover the illegality of a third party discussed. (That said, I’m not a lawyer.)

Where is Huma?

I bet she’s changing safe houses more frequently than Pablo Escobar.


12 posted on 10/29/2016 10:27:06 AM PDT by Fitzy_888 ("ownership society")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DOGHEAD

Oh and also- since Huma forwarded them to a Yahoo domain then
A lot of Sate info is sitting at Yahoo servers. Even if they bleach it their local devices. People should go to prison over this scheme.


13 posted on 10/29/2016 10:29:48 AM PDT by DOGHEAD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

The statement by some that none of these were from or to Hillary is patently absurd. Huma’s whole employment - both for CGI and State was predicated on her position as the primary assistant to Hillary. In fact, one can safely assume based on the likely scheme for pay to play as well as the penchant for her boss to be unapproachable and snarky that most requests to Hillary went through Huma.

It is also fair to say that Huma is now in an impossible position. She must have answered questions about where the devices containing classified emails were or when they were disposed of.... if she had these in her possession she is in big trouble. If she had these in her possession and did not realize or remember it then there is a high probability that the emails Clinton ordered to be deleted are now in the hands of the FBI (the ones they did not want anyone to see) and there may even be emails showing the cover-up.

What a mess. Everything this woman (Hillary) touches turns to mud in a hurry and the idiots who tied their star to her (aides and voters) are about to reap the consequences of laying with a pig. It was already muddy and crusty, but a whole heap of water was poured on it yesterday.

I can’t make heads or tails of wikileaks and what they are going to drop or not going to drop, but there seem to be some credible sources saying they have much more. I still don’t think they will drop any classified emails that they have though - that would place them on a different level legally.

The arrogance and stupidity of this bunch should be enough to disqualify them in a sane world from holding power, but we live in a nation full of ignorance.


14 posted on 10/29/2016 10:31:32 AM PDT by volunbeer (Clinton Cash = Proof of Corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

If they did not pertain to Clinton, the Clinton investigation would not have been reopened...A new investigation into Huma and “Carlos” would...

This is about HILLARY.....


15 posted on 10/29/2016 10:31:34 AM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

‘Zackly. The would not have gone from NYPD to FBI unless there was something of interest.


16 posted on 10/29/2016 10:31:55 AM PDT by IdahoVeteran
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Fitzy_888

I don’t think spousal privilege comes into play here. If the communication is on a device that the NYPD or FBI has already obtained, then the point is moot. Abedin and Weiner can’t be forced to testify against each other, but their communications through other means cannot be considered confidential on that basis.


17 posted on 10/29/2016 10:32:49 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Go ahead, bite the Big Apple ... don't mind the maggots.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MaxistheBest

When the Clintonoids state something is a fact when they have absolutely no clue whether it is true or not they are lying.

Lying is who they are.

Lying is what they do.

They have done since the Arkansas days—about forty years now.

Anyone who pays any attention to their noise is a complete idiot.

It is a waste of time to debate them, to talk to them, or to treat with anything less than total disgust and disdain.

Any MSM reporter who does so is a total clown.

End of rant.


18 posted on 10/29/2016 10:35:18 AM PDT by cgbg (Another World War I veteran for Hillary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: volunbeer
I don't think Wikileaks will have any hesitation about dumping classified e-mails. If they were turned over to them by someone else, then I don't think they have the same legal risks as the original source of the information.

And hasn't the U.S. already threatened to arrest Assange anyway? LOL.

19 posted on 10/29/2016 10:35:48 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Go ahead, bite the Big Apple ... don't mind the maggots.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

I thought Huma had forwarded these e-mails from her secured government e-mail to her private e-mail. That doesn’t mean they did not originate with Clinton. My guess is that they did.


20 posted on 10/29/2016 10:35:50 AM PDT by KansasGirl (Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice." Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson