Posted on 10/23/2016 6:56:24 PM PDT by MNDude
I heard that James Okeefe had a really damning video of Hillary and I was really disappointed that he did not release it before the debate. To make it worse Okeefe and Trump have allowed early voting to commence without allowing those voters to consider these "nuclear bomb "videos.
What fool would allow for millions of voters to go to the polls in a close election without showing this to them first? Especially when it is the Democrats strategy to have as many people vote is early as possible for their image of a landslide.
And that is exactly reason why this video is going to be so damn devastating. It is so bad, that normally the Democrats would immediately replace Hillary with somebody else like Biden or Gore, who would might come in as an untarnished white knight. But they can't. Too late, any Democrat replacement cannot get the millions of votes already cast. I feel like a kid at Christmas waiting for that video tomorrow.
On top of things, it looks like WikiLeaks is also building up for some huge unrelated release, which seems to frighten Obama and his administration a lot more then the Okeefe videos do.
Get ready for some fireworks tomorrow.
“Impeachment if she wins.
On day one.”
Not much chance, I suppose, of this working, but there is a way that Congress can reject the results of the Electoral College.
Objections
Since 1887, 3 U.S.C. 15 sets the method for objections to electoral votes. During the Joint Session, Members of Congress may object to individual electoral votes or to state returns as a whole. An objection must be declared in writing and signed by at least one Representative and one Senator. In the case of an objection, the Joint Session recesses and each chamber considers the objection separately in a session which cannot last more than two hours with each Member speaking for no more than five minutes. After each house votes on whether or not to accept the objection, the Joint Session reconvenes and both chambers disclose their decisions. If they agree to the objection, the votes in question are not counted. If either chamber does not agree with the objection, the votes are counted.
Objections to the Electoral College votes were recorded in 1969 and 2005. In both cases, the House and Senate rejected the objections and the votes in question were counted.
http://history.house.gov/Institution/Electoral-College/Electoral-College/
That’s truth!
The one and only thing the press will crucify her for, is a racist tirade...on tape.
Now how O’Keefe could have pulled that off IDK. I doubt it, but we shall see.
Won’t happen......she’s already avoided prosecution when it is obvious to the entire world she is guilty.....the GOPE and Deorats will have their seats and they sure as heck aren’t going to vote for any Impeachment of “themselves” ..it’s a one party system...we have no functional congress.
I’d be shocked if that were true. There will only be surpises against Trump and not for him. Hitlery is too scripted to get caught with a hot mic.
2018 really won’t matter much if Clinton wins this election. This is truly the last election that matters.
GO TRUMP !!
Thank you...:^)
This stuff is sounding more and more like click-bait buzzfeed headlines.
meh....that might be a hoax...hmmmmmm
Fishing for $ from the CF, DNC, other dem donors.
Can anyone tell me how O’Keefe was able to infiltrate Hillary’s campaign? Who or what was he posing as? How long had he been working undercover to get so many people to take him into their confidence? Or was it someone who worked for O’Keefe? Just curious how he pulled this off. It’s masterful!
never mind ... disregard
Thanks.
It seems 29 states and the Dist. of Columbia have such laws.
However, I also found this
http://archive.fairvote.org/?page=967
“Over the years, however, despite legal oversight, a number of electors have violated their state’s law binding them to their pledged vote. However, these violators often only face being charged with a misdemeanor or a small fine, usually $1,000. Many constitutional scholars agree that electors remain free agents despite state laws and that, if challenged, such laws would be ruled unconstitutional. Therefore, electors can decline to cast their vote for a specific candidate (the one that wins the popular vote of their state), either voting for an alternative candidate, or abstaining completely.”
Example....the WikiLeaks exposures have been overwhelmed by the bogus claims from women about Trump's behavior.
He said he had an “intern “get into the White House.
Wont happen unless we purge congress. Uniparty leadership on our side has to go or none of it happens.
Doubt mitch would do anything to convict.
Her rant against Donna Brazile caught on tape?
“If this rumor is on the up and up, it’s got to be the n-word. But we will see.”
Unfortunately I doubt she uses the N-word. Although she does say something racist against blacks apparently. Maybe something like blacks are so violent, they are easy to manipulate. I really have no idea. I guess we’ll see.
A forest of Wikis has already fallen. Almost no on seemed to hear or react. There were a few rare exceptions to this willful ignorance. I want something devastating tomorrow.
I want it to rock her world personally and politically. Otherwise, why even bother?
This better not be a “She said the N word to a Cable Guy in 2003.” kind of expose’.
...and without the media, it takes 1.5 weeks before anyone even notices the video let alone watches it
It’s rigged folks
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.