Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Vanity] What Okeefe releases tomorrow is going to be devastating.

Posted on 10/23/2016 6:56:24 PM PDT by MNDude

I heard that James Okeefe had a really damning video of Hillary and I was really disappointed that he did not release it before the debate. To make it worse Okeefe and Trump have allowed early voting to commence without allowing those voters to consider these "nuclear bomb "videos.

What fool would allow for millions of voters to go to the polls in a close election without showing this to them first? Especially when it is the Democrats strategy to have as many people vote is early as possible for their image of a landslide.

And that is exactly reason why this video is going to be so damn devastating. It is so bad, that normally the Democrats would immediately replace Hillary with somebody else like Biden or Gore, who would might come in as an untarnished white knight. But they can't. Too late, any Democrat replacement cannot get the millions of votes already cast. I feel like a kid at Christmas waiting for that video tomorrow.

On top of things, it looks like WikiLeaks is also building up for some huge unrelated release, which seems to frighten Obama and his administration a lot more then the Okeefe videos do.

Get ready for some fireworks tomorrow.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: chat; okeefe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-190 next last
To: doug from upland

It is at www.market-ticker.org. - breaking from anonymous. Benghazi treason. Both Hillary and Obama.


161 posted on 10/24/2016 3:36:32 AM PDT by ImaGraftedBranch (by reading this, you have collapsed my wave function. Thanks, pal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

38 some percent are voting for Illary no matter what comes out.


162 posted on 10/24/2016 3:46:14 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ ( "Hokahey, today is a good day to die!" Crazy Horse prior to the Battle of Little Big Horn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81

“When you vote for president you are voting for electors pledged to that candidate.”

That’s pretty clear on the TN ballot I voted. You’re not voting for the candidate.


163 posted on 10/24/2016 3:50:51 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bk1000

Someone posted that he said he’d had an operative/mole in the White Hut for a long time — maybe a year. That could be interesting since he always has videos.


164 posted on 10/24/2016 3:52:34 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
The revolution has begun.

Way to go, Hildy!

Indeed, the revolution has begun!

165 posted on 10/24/2016 3:55:59 AM PDT by BunnySlippers (I Love Bull Markets!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WENDLE

“Unless he has her saying the “N” word , nobody gives a crap.”

It still wouldn’t matter. They’ll use the excuse, “What she says in private is her own personal business.” Robt. Byrd said it; nobody cared.


166 posted on 10/24/2016 3:56:27 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof

“They called him out as a “criminal” whose “highly edited” and “highly misleading” videos at Planned Parenthood of selling baby body parts was dismissed”

I don’t think that was Project Veritas. I believe it was another organization. (Maybe I’m wrong...)


167 posted on 10/24/2016 3:58:25 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: MNDude
 photo giphy-downsized-large_zps14xddszs.gif
168 posted on 10/24/2016 4:00:26 AM PDT by TornadoAlley3 ( I'm Proud To Be An Okie From Muskogee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

“Maybe something like blacks are so violent, they are easy to manipulate.”

We have her on tape calling blacks “predators”. She’s still here. Nobody cares.


169 posted on 10/24/2016 4:02:47 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

Cried wolf too many times
Only mildly interested in what he has at this point
So far all we got has been hamburger helper
With no meat


170 posted on 10/24/2016 4:10:02 AM PDT by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww

It would seem that his decisions have made him increasingly irrelevant and to recapture his past glory, he is rapidly moving to the left.

The left will never embrace him as he leaves behind what made him.


171 posted on 10/24/2016 4:12:27 AM PDT by CriticalJ (Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress.. But then I repeat myself. MT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: TheNext
-- U.S. Constitution says you vote for Candidates, NOT Electors, and the vote is BOUND, unchangeable. --

That is not correct.

Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.

The Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States. (US Const. Art. I, Sec. 1)

The Electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President ... (US Const. Amd. 12)

The electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed, in each State, on the Tuesday next after the first Monday in November, in every fourth year succeeding every election of a President and Vice President. (3 USC 1) (3 USC 2 allows the states to shift this day to later, by state law).

The electors of President and Vice President of each State shall meet and give their votes on the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December next following their appointment at such place in each State as the legislature of such State shall direct. (3 USC 7)

State legislatures have prescribed a popular election for the purpose of appointing electors. The states appoint Electors according to a statewide popular election contest.

It is the Electors who cast ballots for candidates.

US Constitution
3 USC Chapter 1

172 posted on 10/24/2016 4:17:41 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: eekitsagreek; bk1000

As it’s been said by me and many others on this forum, Hillary could bite the heads off of live puppies, boil them and eat them on live TV, and not lose a substantial portion of her voter base.


173 posted on 10/24/2016 4:26:21 AM PDT by Hardastarboard (Welcome back to Rome - 471 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TheNext

I have read it. There is NOTHING that binds the electors to a specific candidate.


174 posted on 10/24/2016 5:54:10 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Conservatives love America for what it is. Liberals hate America for the same reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Miss Didi

thank you


175 posted on 10/24/2016 7:20:33 AM PDT by bramps (It's the Islam, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: bramps

You’re welcome!


176 posted on 10/24/2016 7:27:21 AM PDT by Miss Didi ("After all...tomorrow is another day." Scarlett O'Hara, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

You lie or are very ignorant.


177 posted on 10/24/2016 7:52:38 AM PDT by TheNext (Hillary Hurts Children & Women)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: TheNext

Then enlighten me with the section of the Constitution or law that binds the electors to a specific candidate. I’m waiting.


178 posted on 10/24/2016 8:55:11 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Conservatives love America for what it is. Liberals hate America for the same reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

“I heard that James Okeefe had a really damning video of Hillary and I was really disappointed that he did not release it before the debate. To make it worse Okeefe and Trump have allowed early voting to commence without allowing those voters to consider these “nuclear bomb “videos.

What fool would allow for millions of voters to go to the polls in a close election without showing this to them first? Especially when it is the Democrats strategy to have as many people vote is early as possible for their image of a landslide.”

Well, neither Wikileaks or O’Keefe are professional pollsters or politicians so they simply don’t have a clue on the momentum of campaigns or the optimum release time. In this case, with all the MSM behind Hillary I agree that it would have been better to let the most damning items out earlier.


179 posted on 10/24/2016 9:04:32 AM PDT by wildbill (If you check behind the shower curtain for a slasher, and find one.... what's your plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

What good will it be if the media won’t mention it or show it? Very few of those who need to see it most will be exposed to it.


180 posted on 10/24/2016 9:50:22 AM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-190 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson