Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Open Vent Vanity
myself | 10/19/2016 | rusty0604

Posted on 10/19/2016 8:35:08 PM PDT by Rusty0604

I don't know if this is allowed, but it is a vanity. This is one of a few things I would like to vent about: I keep hearing from Hillary and a lot of women that Trump is insulting his women accusers by saying "look at her" and "that wouldn't be my first choice". I am a woman, and I can tell you that, whenever I have said that about a man or woman under any circumstance, I was NOT referring to physical appearance but the person as a whole. I'm getting sick and tired of hearing this. When you look at a person, you are looking at a lot of things.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: grey_whiskers

And because he resigned that proves it was true. Why don’t they admit that?


21 posted on 10/19/2016 8:58:52 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

That was my point exactly: no one would have thought anything of it if he’d said “Such a nasty man” to a male opponent.

The media are already playing the “female” card, though.


22 posted on 10/19/2016 9:00:43 PM PDT by TXBlair (We will not forget Benghazi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe

I’ll pay, but I’m trying to conserve space by consolidating vanities into one. I figured if open line Fridays works for Rush why not open vent vanities for Free Republic?


23 posted on 10/19/2016 9:03:47 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

In response to statements about Russian hackers:
If somebody would use the secure government provided computer servers and follow the cyber-security procedures already in place, maybe Russia wouldn’t be able to steal so many emails.


24 posted on 10/19/2016 9:05:41 PM PDT by toast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndyTheBear

Very good analysis.


25 posted on 10/19/2016 9:06:28 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: toast

Hillary was getting angry, saying it is a fact that the Russian government was responsible, but in fact it hasn’t been proven. Also, does that change the validity of the material that wS leaked? No.


26 posted on 10/19/2016 9:10:09 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

Actually, I lived in those times as an attractive woman with brains making it in the corporate world. Guess what? I made it without sleeping with or suing any of the men I worked with. These weak women give women’s rights a bad name. A lot of the women I worked with were more evil than the men.


27 posted on 10/19/2016 9:20:34 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604
Hillary was getting angry, saying it is a fact that the Russian government was responsible, but in fact it hasn’t been proven. Also, does that change the validity of the material that wS leaked? No.

1) Remember during the 2008 campaign where they had Tina Fey make fun of Sarah Palin, saying “...and I can see Russia from my house?” (and many Democrats to this day still believe Palin really said that). And then during the 2012 campaign, the line against Romney was, “The 1980s called, they want their foreign policy back” ? Why is it the Dems are blaming Wikileaks on RUSSIAN hackers? 2) And, if the Russians DID hack the servers, the Dems are admitting that Hillary’s private server DID make us less safe. How can they protect us from anything else if they can’t even guard their own illegal conduct, even by using a secret hush-hush clandestine server? 3) And if it really WAS the Russians, why did Assange’s Internet have to get cut? That wouldn’t stop Putin or whatever he re-named the KGB, would it? “The Russians can see EVERYTHING from my server!”

28 posted on 10/19/2016 9:23:59 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

This woman agrees. “Look at them” means the creepy scale.


29 posted on 10/19/2016 9:28:55 PM PDT by bgill (From the CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Megyn just couldn’t let the subject die. She was on and on and on and on about it. No, Megyn, he did not know those women. You don’t know the person sitting next to you on a plane. You don’t know a person who two seconds earlier introduced themselves. You don’t know every single beauty contestant. Just because a waitperson says, “Hi, I’m Janet and I’ll be your server today.” Ok, fine, her name is Janet but you do not know her.

Megyn was acting like a little 15 year old who was snubbed by the quarterback. She needs to get over herself.


30 posted on 10/19/2016 9:34:12 PM PDT by bgill (From the CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TXBlair

Hellary wants to be treated equally to a man but when she is, she and her minions can’t take it.


31 posted on 10/19/2016 9:35:27 PM PDT by bgill (From the CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pardon Me

Exactly. If there wasn’t voter fraud and cheating, then what’s with all the tapes? What’s with Indiana filing suit today over all the dead voters? What’s with all the arguing about voter ID? Uh, helloooo, because there IS voter fraud. And that is exactly why Wallace asked the question. If there truly weren’t fraud, then Wallace wouldn’t have brought the subject up.


32 posted on 10/19/2016 9:38:44 PM PDT by bgill (From the CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper
I can watch CNN Live on YouTube and FReep at the same time in dual screen mode. :)


33 posted on 10/19/2016 9:42:19 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

I worked with a guy that actually got mad and threw something because I pointed out that Tina Fey and not Sara Palin said that.


34 posted on 10/19/2016 9:44:54 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

I worked with a guy that actually got mad and threw something because I pointed out that Tina Fey and not Sara Palin said that.


35 posted on 10/19/2016 9:49:17 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: bgill
In the second Project Veritas video, indiana and Michigan are named explicitly as states with weak laws governing voter fraud, and the folks on the video are brainstorming ways to commit voter fraud while skirting conspiracy laws and while finding ways to evade detection through shell companies hiring illegal aliens in order for them to have the necessary documents to be "certified" as a voter in a particular district.

Indiana has noticed 42,000 Bureau of Motor Vehicle records with names and/or addresses wrong, (notified by real citizens), and has called in the State Police to help with the investigation.

36 posted on 10/19/2016 9:50:30 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: bgill

Have you never said look at him or her as in look at their lifestyle, work, family of personal life?


37 posted on 10/19/2016 9:55:14 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Pardon Me

They all think we have forgotten 2000 and the attempt by the Democrats to steal the election.


38 posted on 10/19/2016 10:14:16 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Thank you for your rant. I am glad you posted it. I saw Bloody Megyn go after Trump, calling him out for making remarks about the appearance of some of the women who claim that they had issues, and felt outraged that she was deliberately putting a fake meaning to what Trump said. That feminist talking head cannot have it both ways, putting women in trousers and padded shoulders so they can compete equally with men, then insist that their own rules be observed in polite society.

Men routinely say that like or dislike the looks of other men. It doesn't mean the man is handsome or ugly, it means he looks sneaky or honest or whatever. Men say that about women, too, newsflash, and for the same reasons. But Trump, for what ever reason, can't say, for instance, look at that women, because he must be talking about her physical attractiveness. That is so elitist and so double standard and so feminist. I am glad you called her on it.

39 posted on 10/19/2016 10:54:48 PM PDT by SandwicheGuy (*The butter acts as a lubricant and speeds up the CPU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

On this issue, I think the real truth is that Donald Trump is just babbling in celebrity mode when he should turn the page and stop “mansplaining” what he may or may not have done. I think most people get this more than the media may think, Hollywood is not the real world and celebtrity status in general warps the fabric of human interaction.

My guess is that these stories are an eclectic mixture of fantasy, hyperbole, truth about lack of impulse control, and delusion. They probably form no organized or coherent set, other than a rush to publicity in the politicized hope of derailing a campaign.

The problem is that we have to choose between one person who we know is dangerous and unsuitable, and another person who is perhaps flawed or at least was flawed ten years or more ago. There isn’t some third choice, unless God plans to have the second coming between now and November 8th.


40 posted on 10/20/2016 2:39:52 AM PDT by Peter ODonnell (No Evidence of Vote Fraud -- CNN --Massive Evidence of Global Warming -- CNN-- where's Nelson Muntz?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson