Posted on 09/23/2016 4:52:17 PM PDT by Beave Meister
Video Credit: YouTube California Republican Rep. Tom McClintock started a Congressional hearing by reading a Washington Post article detailing the impacts of global warming on the Arctic ecosystem.
He read:
The Arctic Ocean is warming up, icebergs are growing scarcer and some place the seals are finding the water too hot.
He then asked Obama's top climate adviser Christy Goldfuss, "Is this the crisis you're referring to?", referring to new guidance her council issued on accounting for global warming impacts.
Goldfuss said, "It's a crisis we're trying to address...I'm not familiar with that report."
Then McClintock nailed her saying, "Perhaps the reason is because it was November 2, 1922 that The Washington Post carried this article."
Boom!
(Excerpt) Read more at kfiam640.iheart.com ...
NOT MAN-MADE.
Tom was the very best congressman I ever worked with. He was light years ahead of everybody in CA.
We all miss him very much. He would be an outstanding Governor. This state sure could use a person with some common sense.
The only warming going on there was centered around her bottom.
He should have been governor instead of Schwartzegger. IIRC, after we recalled Davis (McClintock leading the way) the RINOs brought in the muscle-head and his Kennedy wife. What a mistake.
Now we have Moonbeam and Kamala.
Yuck.
The Trees are still doing their thing
Not even a landslide. More like a mudslide.
Kamara is running for US Senate, her opponent is not better than her, She is climate change sucker.
Yes, I remember. I was brokenhearted over it.
That’s why he went to the County govt and eventually won a seat in Congress.
CA sure could use him to get this state back on track.
With all due respect to Rep. McClintock, I wish that he had also mentioned the following major constitutional problem concerning politically correct global warming.
Regardless if scientists had already proven global warming with the consistent results of repeatable, scientific method-based experiments, it remains that the states have never delegated to the corrupt feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate, tax and spend for environmental issues.
In fact, previous generations of state sovereignty-respecting justices had clarified this in general as evidenced by the following excerpts from Supreme Court case opinions.
Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States. Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]. United States v. Butler, 1936.
Heres additional information on the scientific method as it relates to global warming propaganda.
The Scientific Method and Climate Science (Anthony Watts)
Remember in November !
Patriots need to support Trump / Pence by also electing a new, state sovereignty-respecting Congress that will not only work within its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers to support Trumps vision for making America great again for everybody, but will also put a stop to unconstitutonal federal taxes and unconstitutional inteference in state affairs as evidenced by politically correct global warming alarmism.
Note that such a Congress will also probably be willing to fire state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices.
You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.
Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me
Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.
Jill Stein Wants 16-Year-Olds To Vote Because Of Global Warming
Global Warming on Free Republic here, here, and here
what a sorry anti-science rep of the government!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.