Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: orchestra

Ford’s pardon of Nixon relied heavily on a previous case (in the early ‘50s, I think), where judges rules that accepting a pardon is an implicit admission of guilt, so charges are not actually required if the pardon is accepted.


42 posted on 09/23/2016 12:27:20 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: jjotto
Ford’s pardon of Nixon relied heavily on a previous case (in the early ‘50s, I think), where judges rules that accepting a pardon is an implicit admission of guilt, so charges are not actually required if the pardon is accepted.

That was Burdick v. United States, 1915. It held that the pardonee must introduce the pardon into court proceedings and that, in so doing, the pardonee admits guilt. But, of course, having been pardoned, the pardonee skates.

In practice, Nixon didn't go to court. Nor would Hillary.

51 posted on 09/23/2016 12:44:44 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson