IT'S PAT!
It’s all about me
It’s all about me
It can’t about thee
It’s too easy to see
It’a all about me
What is the child’s plumbing and DNA? End of discussion, unless the child is a true hermaphrodite.
IT'S PAT!
You’re 10, kid.
You’re whatever gender you are. Ask your doctor to explain it to you. Unless there’s a congenital defect, it’s binary.
When puberty hits, that binary fact will make a whole lot more sense.
Stop letting people confuse you.
Why, he must be a Hexidecimal!
More deviant adult words being forced from the mouth of an innocent child. Yes, this is the adults’ doing. They are using a child as their perverted mouthpiece.
Okay, “Leo”, translate “1101” (base 2) into base 10.
If you cannot, then you do not know what binary is, and therefore don’t know if you are or are not.
10 years old. Wait until the hormones kick in a puberty.
It is called the Tom boy phase. Plenty of girls have that.
I know I did. My sisters did not. both the have degrees in Accounting and Finance and I went in the Army. But I never once wanted to be a guy. I am not girly, which God understood and blessed me with only sons. These days it is crazy that society thinks that kids know what they are.
Labels, labels who’s got the labels?
Libs label conservatives with all kinds of horrid names, give others the labels of their choice and we’re supposed to recognize and respect THEIR labels.
He wants to be “Just me” after putting a label on himself and I’ll be labelled intolerant when I roll my eyes at this stupidity.
“didn’t feel quite right”
That’s because your parents are left-wing sh*theads.
I sympathize because those same types of people are making me feel the same way about this country.
“Non-binary 10 year old.”
Octal, then? Maybe hexadecimal.
It’s Pat!
The parents need as much counseling as the child, if not more so!
Leo’s “dad” needs a kick in the balls for allowing this.
I thought I was a boy. But I screamed like a little girl the time I got my thing caught in the zipper.
But in all seriousness, we used to have a perfectly sensible name for this: Tomboy. A name that everyone accepted, respected and understood, and which allowed plenty of room for individual variability. No one automatically expected all tomboys to grow up to be bull-dykes either, we all understood it for what it usually was, a phase.
Maybe the problem stems from the fact that there was never any correlative for boys. Girly or gentle boys have almost always been shunned and mocked, and I am sure that pushes many of them into homosexuality, or makes them targets for sexual predators — at the very least they grow up with a grudge against “normal” society. And so we get our next generation of petty tyrants and pajama boys.
I wonder whether having an acceptable name such as tomboy for less-than masculine boys would result in them growing up to be normal, masculine men and not flaming liberals. Maybe we wouldn’t have so many disturbed adults pushing this gender crap, nor kids being warped to believe they’re freaking pan-asexual unicorns instead of just a normal kid going through a phase.
This is the only reason I support anti-bullying measures in schools, theoretically. Not so much the way they are actually inacted. But I have seen for myself how bullying almost always leads to a new crop of maladjusted leftists.
Oh dear
Don’t they teach biology anymore?