blurry or bloody???
And again the use of the term ‘explosion’ instead of ‘bombing’ which has completely different meanings.
By white supremist = terrorism.
By Muslim = violence.
VIOLENCE IS MUCH LESS DANGEROUS THAN TERRORISM!!!
Or is it the other way around?
Or is the first one the result of the second one, but not in all cases. Or is it vice versa.
EITHER WAY, NOTHING TO SEE HERE!!!
There is no essential difference between the two. Both cases are intent to cause harm to others; and, both versions of perpetrators should be located and punished to the full extent of the deed.
Pressure cooker bomb? New York! Boston Marathon!! It’s muslim terrorism!!!!
“There will be more, says the muslim:
http://nypost.com/2016/09/18/there-will-be-more-chilling-911-call-after-the-chelsea-explosion/
“Honorary Serb” predicted the terrorist “October surprise”:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3453931/posts?page=27#27
Slow Joe is going to be mad, DeBlasio is stealing his stuff!
No No No ... trying to “define” them as one or the other is wrong. This was TERRORISM, “violence” is something else. But the question is whether or not it is ISLAMIC TERRORISM, that’s what they won’t say, so they use “violence” instead.
What blurry line?
Most elected criminals are running around without a brain shouting that we don't know how the killer are tied to the KORANIMAL savage killers...
I DON'T GIVE A FLYING GUCK HOW OR IF THEY ARE RELATED.
Shoot all the SOBs on sight and let God sort them out...
Stupid too PC clever jerk!
I still don't think bullshit can be piled that high...
Another lib weasel definition of “is” exercise. It’s sure as hell terrorism to the people injured in the blasts, no matter who initiated the bombings.
It's their clever way of never needing to say “NO!” to terrorists, perverts, criminals, other liberals and aggrieved people of color.
They are so smart that what seems like common sense to me or you is for them a multi faceted prism that is beyond our perception.
If this ass hat said the sky is blue, I wouldn't believe him.
we know how it works.. If an Islamist does it, it’s workplace violence, or a deranged lone individual...
If a white person or Christian defends their own rights, that’s classified as terrorism
I think soon the definition of terrorism will be any altercation with the government (or their protected entities), while violence will be defined as attacks against civilians. An Orwellian world we live in.
I saw a unicorn last week.
Democrat leadership employs more tactics in wordsmithing than they do in leading our country. We have an army of Merkels posing as our representatives.
It has nothing to do with Islamic terrorism. America just has too much pressure-cooker violence.
the author writes: "there was “no specific and credible threat against New York City at this point in time from any terror organization”—though he noted the incident is being treated as an “intentional act.”
My head is exploding.
So, explosives fall into a pressure cooker which falls into a dumpster. The whole thing just happens to have a detonating device which triggers the whole thing to go off. I can fully understand the views which would cause one to keep an open mind about whether this was a deliberate act or not. Fairness requires that we overlook the impossible odds that this happened by chance - is it clear that my sarcasm is dripping from this like honey from a comb?
And no, we cannot guess that this might be terrorism, because we have no specific and credible threat against NYC "at this time." Dear Mr. Mayor, I am writing to let you know that I am directing a threat against New York City, at this time. Your cheesecake is not Halal and your women need to observe purdah. Yours truly in the name of Allah, the Sublime, Selim ibn Mahmoud. P.S. You can call my cousin Wasim al Fuktupi who will tell you that I am the threat I say that I am.
Remind me again what happened on 9/11.
Bombs go off every day; we must separate the regular violent bombings from the terrorist bombings! /S