Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Timpanagos1
IIRC, the trade was dominated by Dutch, British, & Portuguese...

Few, if any, American ships/captains were directly involved in obtaining African slaves.
And colonial ships or vendors didn't even exist. (The sponsoring companies might have been involved but their main interest was in taking wealth OUT of the colonies, not buying property to bring into them).

See reference to Rhode Island in the original article regarding indentured European workers' 10 year servitude being applied to African slaves as well.
Like it or not, I'd venture that about half of the Mayflower & associated descendants' ancestors came over under indenture (contract) or threat of prison.
(In tracing our lineage, my mother turned up the ship her esteemed ancestor rode to the new world, the manifest read "Irish labor"...just prior to independence)

21 posted on 09/14/2016 6:18:46 AM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: norton

But in the other side of the auction block were colonists bidding on other human beings, and then forcing them to do unpaid labor and then selling their children.


24 posted on 09/14/2016 9:23:47 AM PDT by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson