Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Glock scheduled for trial in personal injury case
guns.com ^ | Aug. 24, 2016 | Daniel Terrill

Posted on 08/25/2016 4:49:19 PM PDT by PROCON


A $75,000 personal injury case against Glock filed by an Arkansas policeman has been scheduled for trial in a federal court, according to the final scheduling order issued last week.

The jury trial will start Aug. 21, 2017, in a federal court in Helena, Arkansas, the order says. Final arguments and discovery exhibits are due in the beginning months of the year.

The plaintiff in the case, Larry Jones, of Cherry Valley, Arkansas, was injured when his Glock 19C pistol discharged unexpectedly at the shooting range in June 2013, the lawsuit says. At the time he was trying to attach a tactical light.

According to the complaint, the pistol had not been modified or changed since he bought the pistol in December 2000. The lawsuit alleges Glock sold the pistol “in a defective condition which rendered (it) unreasonably dangerous.”

The Glock pistol’s lack of a manual safety and other similar features are the subject of what the lawsuit characterizes as defects that led to the injury. Also, Glock did not give “a reasonable and adequate warning of dangers inherent and/or reasonably foreseeable in the use” of the pistol, the lawsuit says.

According to the complaint, Jones injured his left foot and has experienced pain and suffering since the incident. In response, Glock denied all allegations presented in the complaint. The case was originally filed in a Arkansas state court, but was transferred to a federal civil court in May.

Glock, an Austrian company with its U.S. headquarters in Smyrna, Georgia, has had its fair share of criticism due to the lack of a manual safety. Critics have long said the design is attributable to a rise in accidental discharges and misfirings and requires more training to handle it adequately.

Despite the criticism, the company is the leading producer of handguns for law enforcement with 65 percent of market share. In fact, the Federal Bureau of Investigation just renewed contracts with Glock to the tune of $85 million. According to recent estimates, Glock has an annual revenue of $400 million.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: arkansas; banglist; glock; larryjones; larryjonesidiot; lawsuit; liability; police
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
To: PROCON
 
 
There IS a manual safety on the Glocks - it's called keep-your-dang-finger-away-from-the-trigger-until-ready-to-fire.
 
 

21 posted on 08/25/2016 5:04:35 PM PDT by lapsus calami (What's that stink? Code Pink ! ! And their buddy Murtha, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
and the RATS say only cops should be allowed to carry guns
22 posted on 08/25/2016 5:05:20 PM PDT by Chode (You Owe Them Nothing - Not Respect, Not Loyalty, Not Obedience, NOTHING!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

I guess everyone who has bashed their thumb with a hammer will now be in court shortly.

I imagine all the trampoline accident folks will flood the courts too.


23 posted on 08/25/2016 5:06:52 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

I’m not sure I’d admit I was this big of a dunce and a klutz for $75,000.00.


24 posted on 08/25/2016 5:07:02 PM PDT by CrazyIvan (Socialists are just communists in their larval stage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

When a Glock goes to court does it get another gun for a lawyer?

Is there a legal firm made up of guns? Kline, Smith & Wesson?


25 posted on 08/25/2016 5:08:02 PM PDT by TigersEye (~0bama - the downgrade president!~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I’ve seen dumber stuff on the range


26 posted on 08/25/2016 5:09:48 PM PDT by 5Madman2 (Practicing random acts of Douchebaggery whenever possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Case dismissed.
How did it even come to trial?


27 posted on 08/25/2016 5:10:00 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam , Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Too many people have careless moments with their guns that have safeties in the trigger.


28 posted on 08/25/2016 5:10:39 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chode

That was one of the funniest videos


29 posted on 08/25/2016 5:11:44 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam , Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

Even after you have personally unloaded it, even while you’re looking directly at the empty chamber, the damn thing is still loaded, so keep it pointed in a safe direction.

Guns are always loaded, no matter what.


30 posted on 08/25/2016 5:12:50 PM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

If I was Glick’s lawyer I would put the gun on the witness stand. Say ‘your honor I have no further questions’ and invite the opposing counsel to cross examine.


31 posted on 08/25/2016 5:15:00 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

If you own and plan to use or carry a Glock, you have to train with it. 60% of law enforcement across this country use Glocks. 30+ years ago when they first came out, there were several accidental discharges reported as departments transitioned from revolvers or other semi-auto models with safeties. Glocks have the “safe trigger” feature as opposed to a safety. This numnut obviously didn’t listen during his training regarding finger off the trigger until your are clear of the holster and well on the way to pointing in, sights on target. Sorry for his pain, but blaming his mistake on the manufacturer is just pathetic.


32 posted on 08/25/2016 5:15:24 PM PDT by Magnum44 (I dissent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Guns are great. We have a right to them. It’s those evil bullets that kill. Like while you are cleaning or altering your gun.

Boolets, tiny boolets ...

Fired at high velocity ...

Them boolets will kill you and me.


Why use Extreme Shock when you can now have newly created XRBR ammo?

Xtreme Rabid Badger Rounds signal a paradigm shift in home defense and anti-terrorism ammunition. Utilizing the same state of the art technology that puts foam dinosaurs in those plastic capsules that dissolve in hot water, I’ve been able to enhance what would be otherwise boring hollow-point ammunition with a rabid badger core. The exact process is like, totally secret and proprietary.

Upon striking the body of your target, a rabid badger is unleashed through a process that involves a lot of really hard to understand math and physics calculations, and possibly some magic. The resulting stopping power goes beyond devastating, and is actually completely unable to be measured. In every ballistic test conducted, the badger ate the gelatin block, and then quickly turned on the testers.

My cores use very expensive laboratory grade badgers that are 99.9% pure, and 100% insane with rabies.

The shock of a rabid badger bursting from a teammate’s body and then going totally nuts adds a psychological warfare element unmatched by any other ammunition maker in the industry today. To further enhance this, I took a cue from the A-10 Warthog, and painted a scary face on each and every round.

Already in use by Elite Team Fighting and many other highly trained special operations forces around the world, XRBR rounds represent the zenith in small arms ammunition technology. Get yours today!


33 posted on 08/25/2016 5:16:45 PM PDT by USMCPOP (Father of LCpl. Karl Linn, KIA 1/26/2005 Al Haqlaniyah, Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck

this reminds me of the story of the current or former derringer owner’s son. they have a handgun that shoots 410’s i believe. while working on the gun he accidentally discharge a round into his abdomen. The gunpower cauterized the wound after the pellets destroyed his insides.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SoWsLdxUTs


34 posted on 08/25/2016 5:17:19 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2 (all your base are belong to us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

lol. If fools everyone and hires a knife.


35 posted on 08/25/2016 5:19:43 PM PDT by dp0622 (The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

So it took 13 years for this guy to tumble onto the “manufacturer’s defect?” More likely 13 years wear and tear with minimal maintenance is the problem here.


36 posted on 08/25/2016 5:20:42 PM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

What a Dumbass!


37 posted on 08/25/2016 5:21:45 PM PDT by Big Red Badger (UNSCANABLE in an IDIOCRACY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

Oh, yeah, barrister Mac. I hear he’s a real shark!


38 posted on 08/25/2016 5:24:28 PM PDT by TigersEye (~0bama - the downgrade president!~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ThunderSleeps
More likely 13 years wear and tear with minimal maintenance is the problem here.

No, the guy broke the cardinal gun safety rules.

Glock has no liability.

39 posted on 08/25/2016 5:24:51 PM PDT by PROCON ("Lock Her Up! Lock Her Up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: USMCPOP
.. through a process that involves a lot of really hard to understand math and physics calculations, and possibly some magic.

Seems legit :-)

40 posted on 08/25/2016 5:27:37 PM PDT by PROCON ("Lock Her Up! Lock Her Up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson