Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TigerLikesRooster
First, the CO2 is not the problem.
If you care about climate, burning wood is carbon neutral since it comes from trees that absorbed the CO2 from the air as it grew.
The sawdust pile is still small compared to the rest of the wood that was shipped elsewhere.

Possible solutions to the noxious smoke problem:
Split the giant pile into several smaller piles that would be manageable and extinguishable.
Or blow in more air into the fire to make it burn faster and cleaner.
Or compress the sawdust into fire logs and sell it.

20 posted on 07/26/2016 8:19:12 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BitWielder1

not the problem.
If you care about climate, burning wood is carbon neutral since it comes from trees that absorbed the CO2 from the air as it grew.
The sawdust pile is still small compared to the rest of the wood that was shipped elsewhere.


That’s a violation of global community discussion standards. No common sense allowed.


39 posted on 07/26/2016 8:35:38 AM PDT by samtheman (Vote Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson