Posted on 06/13/2016 7:51:53 PM PDT by nickcarraway
Researchers have conducted experiments to test whether there is a gender bias in costly altruism.
Costly altruism – helping others at the cost of yourself – is perhaps a noble cause, but in the fight for gender equality, does a gender bias towards women affect who we choose to save or not?
A study conducted by Cambridge University’s Medical Research Council’s Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit in collaboration with Columbia University suggests that most people think women’s welfare should be preserved over men’s.
Appearing in the Social Psychological and Personality Science journal, the study details three psychology experiments conducted by the team.
The first is a variation of the classic psychology test “Lifeboat Experiment” in which test subjects were asked who they would choose, if they could only save three out of five passengers in a lifeboat. In the variation, volunteers were asked how willing they would be to push one person in front of an oncoming trolley if it meant saving a group of people further down. Some were told the gender of the person they could push was female; others were told it was male and some that the individual was gender-neutral.
The results showed that both female and male volunteers were more likely to push the male or gender-neutral passerby than they were the female passerby.
For the second experiment, a new group of subjects was brought in and provided with £20 each. They were asked to interact with a separate group of volunteers not partaking in the study and informed that how much money they retained at the end of the experiment would be multiplied by ten. If they chose to keep the money, the individuals they interacted with would receive electric shocks. If they gave up the money, those individuals would be spared.
Once again, the results showed that women were less likely to be subjected to the harmful act – electric shocks even at the costly altruism of losing money. Women in particular were less willing to shock other women.
For the final experiment, the researchers wanted to find out the rationale behind the bias towards protecting women and so presented their volunteers with a survey that included questions such as: “On a sinking ship, who should you save first? Men, women, or no order”, “According to social norms, how morally acceptable is it to harm (men/women) for money?”, and “According to social norms, how well do (men/women) tolerate pain?”
Answers to the questions showed that generally, societal norms dictated a behavior of better protection for women but greater damage to men. The survey also found that most people perceived women to be less able to tolerate pain and found most people believed it unacceptable to hurt women for personal gain.
Furthermore, the researchers noticed, these perspectives were not linked to emotion, as the subjects thought hurt, regardless of gender, was repulsive.
Stereotyping others is not always the cause of costly altruism, however. For example, the book Whistling Vivaldi: And Other Clues to How Stereotypes Affect Us by social psychologist and Berkley University provost Claude Steele examines how stereotypes we ourselves fit into often cause us to behave in ways that are not beneficial to us, sometimes subconsciously.
One particular example from the book is about a group of girls who – before taking a maths test – were reinforced with the idea that, as girls, they are worse at maths than boys. They performed poorly when compared to girls who were not told the stereotype.
Application of these results in the real world could profoundly affect not only how we judge each other but also our approach to education, among other things. If women were less likely to allow other women to undergo electric shocks, would a female judge have delivered a less lenient sentence in the Stanford rape case? Is this how we rebalance altruism in a society where it has been skewed by male dominance?
I prefer a dog over either.
Wow, after 50 years of feminism, men will still save women and children first. Those feminazis need to redouble their efforts if they want to succeed at destroying all that is good.
Hahaha. Thanks for the laugh.
Like "Jingle Bells" played by a symphony orchestra.
Muslim men will gladly sacrifice their women and children first. That was the question wasn't it?
I hold doors open for people any chance I get. And frequently (once a month?) help strangers get groceries or work equipment to their car.
Never had a problem offering help to a man and they often accept. About once a year a woman makes me feel at risk for offering help. Not what the article is about but what the title made me think.
A couple times a year the trivial help I think I offer turns out to be more significant than I expected. So I am happy to take the attacking feminist “no”s and look for any chance to help people.
I hold doors open for people any chance I get. And frequently (once a month?) help strangers get groceries or work equipment to their car.
Never had a problem offering help to a man and they often accept. About once a year a woman makes me feel at risk for offering help. Not what the article is about but what the title made me think.
A couple times a year the trivial help I think I offer turns out to be more significant than I expected. So I am happy to take the attacking feminist “no”s and look for any chance to help people.
I also don't like that idea of women in front line combat roles because I don't like the idea of women getting blown to pieces or captured and abused. I don't like men having to endure that either but somehow with women it's more visceral to me. Yeah, I'm affected by this instinct too, it turns out.
Like every hypothetical, it depends on many factors.
Like it or not it was always women and children first.
Oh!!!! You are right. I guess that defines the civilized from the rest.
Sorry if I spoke too much. Just a little tired of hearing about “ honor killings” etc.....
You are absolutely right. It is unfair to male soldiers to put them in that difficult position. And it must compromise safety
What was it the Bogart character in Casablanca said about sticking his neck out?
I’m female, but I would not hesitate to intervene no matter which gender was in danger.
The difference between real men and Islamic radical “men”.
Yes.
I’m Texan.
Rules, people.
Looks almost real.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.