don’t hate on laz, he has a big point in which why are you soliciting info form a political web site. your boss the real lawyer is gonna have to subpoena people who’s info he uses to testify, and transport/lodge them at his expense for the trial.
and everybody seems to be missing the boat - if your case hinges on the projectile remaining in the skull, you need to prove the absence of a squibb load
Nope. The state needs to prove the likely PRESENCE of a squib load. Burden of proof. Innocent until proven guilty. Reasonable doubt.
They've got a hole in the floor their own detectives on scene photographed. The hole indicates a shot, deflecting towards where the victim was positioned.
There is absolutely no reason to suspect a "squib". Nothing anywhere, no evidence, indicates there was one.
What I'm TRYING to do on this thread, is get ideas....threads to pull on. I think my hypothesis when held up against the evidence. I'm trying to determine what OTHER holes are in the DA's case.
I know what my "boss" needs to do. I do this every day. What I'm trying to do is help my "boss" where he's clueless.
And while FR is a "political web site" in one sense, there are probably hundreds of gun enthusiasts that could add something here if they see the request and want to.
I hope you're not suggesting that the only posts here should be political in nature. Because that's not been my experience. If that has changed, I'm sure someone will alert me to that fact.
But thanks for you kind help and encouragement.