Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ultimate Act of a Frantic Establishment, Willing to do Anything to Stop Trump
Zero Hedge ^ | 5/1/2016 | SM Gibson

Posted on 05/01/2016 10:19:19 AM PDT by Vermont Lt

As Donald Trump inches closer to the Republican nomination, GOP insiders scramble to put a halt to the billionaire’s run for the White House. A new lawsuit filed in the state of California could prove to be the ultimate act of desperation by a frantic establishment willing to go to any lengths to end Trump’s bid for the Oval Office. However, if the allegations contained within the court documents are found to be true, they would not only spell the end of Trump’s presidential aspirations, but most likely his brand as a whole.

(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: 2016election; california; demagogicparty; election2016; hoax; inyourheadrentfree; jeffreyepstein; katiejohnson; lyinted; memebuilding; newyork; partisanmediashill; partisanmediashills; presidentdonaldtrump; trump; tylerdurden; tylerdurdenmyass; zerohedge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
I don't believe this for a second. But I posted it not because of its salaciousness... for the possibilities that arise from the potential discovery. If you recognize the name Epstein, he is the one that reportedly had sex slaves down in the Caribbean where he brought his rich celebrity friends. The name Clinton as been associated with Epstein and his parties.

Donald will fight this, as he does all lawsuits. And when his lawyers start deposing the participants...all hell is going to break loose.

I don't think this is a dirty trick at all. I think its a plant that opens the door for one hell of a fun summer.

1 posted on 05/01/2016 10:19:19 AM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt
...GOP insiders scramble to put a halt to the billionaire’s run for the White House.

Trump committed one of the gravest political sins- he did not pay his party dues, get in line and wait his turn.

2 posted on 05/01/2016 10:22:59 AM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

This is nothing.I expect a serious attempt will be made on Trump’s life in the next 90 days.


3 posted on 05/01/2016 10:23:12 AM PDT by Farmer Dean (168 grains of instant conflict resolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

Im glad to find “fun” in the decline of America. Just a big game for your entertainment.


4 posted on 05/01/2016 10:23:26 AM PDT by Awgie (truth is always stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

Epstein is Bill Clinton’s buddy.


5 posted on 05/01/2016 10:25:53 AM PDT by euram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

Why are you posting this f***ing garbage? The women gave a Phony address, Phony e-mail, Phony telephone number, and to top it off a Phony name. So again, other than your being a disciple of Cruz, why are you posting this shit.


6 posted on 05/01/2016 10:27:23 AM PDT by heights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean

I think an attempt upon Trump’s life is a distinct possibility-especially if it looks like he will be the nominee. I remember old Huey Long who gave the elite left fits in the 1930’s. The left shot him.


7 posted on 05/01/2016 10:28:10 AM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

Already proven to be false.

Read below.

(Hillary!, of course.)

[Blind Gossip] When this horrifying accusation was made against a Presidential Candidate, many assumed that it came from a competitor from within the candidate’s own party.

No. It actually came from the other party!

What do you do when you know that your family member is going to be accused of a terrible crime? Make a preemptive strike! Accuse the accuser first of the exact same crime!

[Candidate 1] just succeeded in putting [Candidate 2] the defensive. It doesn’t matter that the accusation is a complete lie and that it will quickly be discredited.

The important thing is that, later on, when [Candidate 2] accuses [Candidate 1’s spouse] of the same crime, the story will seem stale and retaliatory.

Sadly, it won’t matter if the first accusation is false and that the second accusation is true. They will seem equal in people’s (voter’s) minds and will cancel each other out. This isn’t about the truth. It’s about gamesmanship.


8 posted on 05/01/2016 10:30:26 AM PDT by COUNTrecount (Race Baiting...... "It's What's For Breakfast")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt
I think its a plant that opens the door for one hell of a fun summer.

I think you need to explain what you mean by that statement.

This case will go no where, it is just an attempt to grab big money. Perhaps even if the form of a settlement to make it go away. Sorry, not going to happen.

I'm not even sure the establishment has anything to do with this. George Will or #NeverTrump, I could see doing this perhaps.

9 posted on 05/01/2016 10:31:09 AM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt
This is a hoax lawsuit. The document (at the link) says it's being filed "in pro per" (Pro Per. A term derived from the Latin "in propria persona," meaning "for one's self," used in some states to describe a person who handles his or her own case, without a lawyer).

Yet the filing is in proper legal terminology. Meanwhile, as noted in an earlier FR thread, the address listed is bogus.

10 posted on 05/01/2016 10:32:07 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

Did you read my comment?

I will be very specific. This will kill Clinton, not Trump.

Trump won’t settle this. It is too absurd.

But Epstein is a very dirty pimp. The list that comes out, if they go to discovery, is going to be full of Dems, and some GOP_e folks.

Think beyond what is right in front of your face, and a couple of steps down the road. What happens in these cases? They get a trial date and then discovery starts. Trump has enough lawyers and investigators to dig really, really deep.

If Bill was on more than a few of these trips, there will be hell to pay in NY.


11 posted on 05/01/2016 10:34:14 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (Ask Bernie supporters two questions: Who is rich. Who decides. In the past, that meant who died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS

I think it’s a certainty.

I don’t think it will be successful.

At least I hope not...


12 posted on 05/01/2016 10:36:23 AM PDT by null and void ("when authority began inspiring contempt, it had stopped being authority" ~ H. Beam Piper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean

I too am afraid for Trump’s life. There are trillions of taxpayer dollars at stake....people kill each other over a pair of shoes these days.

If this suit is what I think it is then how stupid. They pulled the same baloney over and over. This isn’t Trump’s style anyway. Anyone can see that.


13 posted on 05/01/2016 10:36:58 AM PDT by Aria (2016: The gravy train v Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

The Cheap Labor Express cannot allow the citizens to elect a President who enforces the laws and borders.
They will do anything it takes to block us from stopping the illegal alien inundation.

I’m praying there is nothing to this.


14 posted on 05/01/2016 10:37:24 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount; JimRed; Farmer Dean; Awgie; heights; Robert DeLong

Jeez guys. Did you even read my comment.

I said this was garbage. I said that it was not true.

I said that this would backfire.

For God’s sake, read the fricken statement before you get your “jump on anything about trump” postings.

It just shows how Pavlovian you have become. Take a breath between pants. And read.


15 posted on 05/01/2016 10:38:11 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (Ask Bernie supporters two questions: Who is rich. Who decides. In the past, that meant who died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

I did read it, I wanted you to know it was false.


16 posted on 05/01/2016 10:39:24 AM PDT by COUNTrecount (Race Baiting...... "It's What's For Breakfast")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

the timing of this charge is very interesting considering Trump been a billionaire and exploitable for a long time..so why if this was in the 90s she now bringing it up also interesting she’s filing in California just before the California primary...

Trump been a high-profile figure for a long time he just hasn’t been a high-profile political figure for a long time to motivate someone to make false charges at this time verses when he wasn’t a political figure

is there any history of her making this charge before against Trump or is this something that just simply occurred 1 month before the California

Sounds very Hill/Thomas like timing


17 posted on 05/01/2016 10:40:22 AM PDT by tophat9000 (King G(OP)eorge III has no idea why the Americans are in rebellion... teach him why)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt
No I merely said you probably need to explain that one statement.

For example: What fun do you see it producing? I think it is just something to either garner money or to put Trump in bad light. In either case I do not see this as a fun time for Trump or myself as a Trump supporter. That is why I am giving you the opportunity to explain that sentence. I would even accept that upon further consideration you considered it a bad choice of words.

I read that you said it wasn't going anywhere, and I agree with you. No one is claiming that you are a Cruzbot, posting this to stir up trouble. But your addition that this would be fun for the summer can raise flags as to why you would find this fun.

18 posted on 05/01/2016 10:47:53 AM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

HOAX

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3564767/Donald-Trump-furiously-denies-woman-s-claims-raped-tycoon-billionaire-pedophile-Jeffrey-Epstein-s-sex-parties.html


19 posted on 05/01/2016 10:47:56 AM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: heights

It is the serious nature of the charge, and not the actual demonstrable facts, that are important here. This is smokescreen and diversionary tactics, trying to shift the narrative, even if only for a few days.

There is no “there” there. Anybody can file a suit in court, about practically anything, based on little more than hearsay, or even pure conjecture.

The terms frivolous and nuisance come to mind. It is like somebody leaving a burning paper sack full of dog feces on your doorstep.

Only we know who was up to that prank.


20 posted on 05/01/2016 10:48:12 AM PDT by alloysteel (Je suis "America First")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson