Except she wasn’t a victim of trafficking. She was a victim of Mormon theology.
As I recall, she was a victim of her mom's weird, guilty-liberal habit of bringing home stray homeless men to work for the family--one of whom returned at night and kidnapped the daughter.
It's possible that's a consequence of Mormon theology somehow, I don't know. But we sure had a bunch of bohemian-agnostic-arty women pursuing similar clueless attempts at charity back East in the 1960s, and they sure weren't Mormon. The results were not too dissimilar.
That’s ridiculous!
Maybe so, but does it matter which theology the perbs believe in to make it less wrong?