"Probable" means "more likely than not".
Police depts need to keep statistics on K-9 "alerting", versus drugs actually found. A K-9 who's alarms do not work out more than 50% of the time shall no longer be "PROBABLE" cause.
If you can teach a horse to ‘do’ math, how hard can it be to get a dog to ‘alert’?
My hunch... just because it was a “bunch of cash” means it had drug contamination; drugs are so ubiquitous now. Why does this need to be argued over and over in courts to be SOP? (Yeah I know. Because it’s a racket.)
Burma (Myanmar) itself, however, isn’t all that Christian-friendly to date. Uncle Sam probably isn’t yet ratting to Myanmar, but a suspicion that he might, is a possible rationale for wanting to keep it secret. The context should be understood. It would probably be easier to convince a Trump (or even Cruz) administration of this than an Obama administration.
At the end of March, a Calgary Police dog attacked a 12 year old, chasing him into his home, pinning him on the kitchen floor and biting him. The boy’s father got the dog off by punching the dog twice in the stomach. Eventually, the handler, who lived in the neighbourhood and had let the dog off the leash, ran into the house and took the dog away. It was the first time neighbours had seen the dog off his leash.
If one of my dogs did that, the cops would have shot my dog or it would have been put down at the SPCA and I would face a BIG fine, if not criminal charges. The police dog was not euthanized. Charges against the handler? Of course not! Some animals are more equal than others, especially the two legged, ‘blue’ kind.