Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Despite NY Win, It Was a Bad Week for Trump
Townhall.com ^ | April 22, 2016 | David Limbaugh

Posted on 04/23/2016 5:20:04 AM PDT by Kaslin

Despite his big win in New York on Tuesday, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has had a pretty bad week. But will it matter? It should -- and just might.

During an NBC "Today" show town hall Thursday, the host read a question from Twitter concerning Trump's views on LGBT issues and how he plans to be inclusive as president. "Speak about North Carolina bathroom law in particular."

Trump responded: "I had a feeling that question was going to come up, I will tell you. Well, look, North Carolina did something that was very strong, and they're paying a big price, and there's a lot of problems. ... North Carolina, what they're going through, with all of the business that's leaving and all of the strife -- and that's on both sides -- you leave it the way it is. There have been very few complaints the way it is. People go, they use the bathroom that they feel is appropriate. There has been so little trouble."

In response to a follow-up question, Trump said he would not support putting new bathrooms in Trump Tower. "I think that would be discriminatory in a certain way."

These politically correct answers from the alleged king of political incorrectness have to be music to the ears of Democrats -- not only those far left enough to agree with Trump's view but all others because they know this will alienate Trump from the tons of Republican voters who recognize such lunacy. Perhaps Trump should have been more forthcoming about his true New York liberal values.

Before you buy into Trump's inevitable walk-back of this disaster, remember how he began his answer: that he had anticipated the question. I'm not sure whether that should be more damning than if his answer had been purely spontaneous, revealing his true feelings apart from political calculation, but it's greatly troubling either way.

Trump says he is concerned about the strife and "the economic punishment (North Carolina is) taking." But it seems he also sees the issue from the perspective of adult men who want to use little girls' bathrooms. Has he even considered this from the perspective of the parents of these girls and all other sane people who don't feel comfortable sharing bathrooms with people of the opposite gender?

Who thinks like this, other than a candidate pandering to new constituencies? Who actually believes that prohibiting grown men from using little girls' bathrooms is discriminatory against the transgender community rather than against the 99 percent of people who have always had the comfort of going to public restrooms without the fear that people of the opposite gender could invade their privacy? Isn't protecting public safety one of government's chief duties?

It will be interesting to see how Trump's infinitely forgiving fans explain this one away or whether they'll even bother to try. I get it; all they think about is unfair trade and "the wall," so maybe they'll explain why Trump wants to tear down public bathroom walls.

Also on Thursday, Trump said he would support raising taxes on the rich, which should concern all economic conservatives who support reducing taxes across the board to stimulate robust economic growth. It should also concern Trump's defenders who believed he was standing by the tax plan posted on his website, which includes a cut to the top rate, from 39.6 percent to 25 percent.

Those convinced that Trump has few ideological moorings and an inclination toward liberal positions are vindicated -- again. No matter what written plans Trump has proposed for use in his campaign, his instincts are to support the liberal position on many issues. And for those who buy that he's made a strong conversion from his previous liberal ways, you should know that there has apparently been no change in Trump's views about taxes since 1991, when he testified as a Democratic expert witness and described Ronald Reagan's tax cuts as "catastrophic."

Those who still believe in the sincerity of Trump's conversion to conservatism should be aware of the other bombshell that exploded this week in Camp Trump, which may be the most troubling of all.

In a private meeting aimed at reassuring concerned GOP leaders about Trump's positions and electability in a general election, Trump's "chief lieutenants" reportedly told them that Trump has been "projecting an image" up to this point in the primary season and "the part that he's been playing is evolving" in a way that will make him more palatable to general election voters. How utterly comforting.

Trump's new campaign guru, Paul Manafort, reportedly told Republican National Committee members that Trump has two personalities -- a private one and another one when he's onstage. "When he's out on the stage, when he's talking about the kinds of things he's talking about on the stump, he's projecting an image that's for that purpose. You'll start to see more depth of the person, the real person. You'll see a real different guy."

So his own campaign chief just comes right out and says Trump has been playing a role -- pretending to be someone he's not? This is just incredible stuff, folks.

For the life of me, I don't understand how Trump's most ardent supporters can feel comfortable relying on his always-shifting promises -- even on immigration. Those who still feel comfortable about his candidacy baffle me.

Yes, Trump won his liberal home state resoundingly, but looking back, this could be one of his worst weeks of the campaign.


TOPICS: Cheese, Moose, Sister
KEYWORDS: brokenrecord; cultistsfortrump; growupalready; howarddeanredux; ilovetowhine; lemonadestand; stupidtopics; tedskeywordtrolls; trumpistindenial; waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-177 next last
To: Kaslin

Yeah sure thing David. Any day now Trump will peak and Ted the Annointed One will take his place


81 posted on 04/23/2016 7:00:37 AM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Madame Dufarge

Correct. If anyone were to check, they would find that the first several times Trump made this statement, his exact quote was: “They say I could shoot...” etc.


82 posted on 04/23/2016 7:02:04 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Madame Dufarge
Trump didn't proclaim this himself, he was rolling his eyes at a media report that made the assertion.

Oh, for crying out loud, HE DID SAY THAT. Watch the video linked to below. Is that Donald Trump speaking, or is it an imposter?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFqCJfUKlls

I realize he said this in half jest, but, remarkably, it is true. He sure wouldn't lose in Freeper support, based on the cultish following he has here, in this once-conservative website.

It was words that came out of his mouth, not a reporter's, so your defense Trump has no merit.
83 posted on 04/23/2016 7:03:54 AM PDT by Dan in Wichita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: LS

Bad week #40?


84 posted on 04/23/2016 7:04:49 AM PDT by ripnbang ("An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man a subject)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dan in Wichita

Hey Dan, have a great day!

Signed,

A Trump supporter.


85 posted on 04/23/2016 7:06:27 AM PDT by ripnbang ("An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man a subject)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Agamemnon
BTTT

The Trump cultists are as blind as a

and are


86 posted on 04/23/2016 7:07:18 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him. He got them and now we have to pay the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Madame Dufarge
corrected link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFqCJfUKlls
87 posted on 04/23/2016 7:09:55 AM PDT by Dan in Wichita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; Jim Robinson
Hey Kaslin I see you are a really pushing for unity.

Congratulations to our presumptive nominee, Donald Trump!

88 posted on 04/23/2016 7:10:18 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Dan in Wichita
You're pretty thick, aren't you?

He said it to mock the press assertions.

so your defense Trump has no merit.

Whatever you say...:-)

Have you tried breathing into a paper bag? It might help clear your head a little.

89 posted on 04/23/2016 7:11:50 AM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

That is an excellent assessment of the current state of the Cruz campaign. I have not heard one new or interesting idea for a long time. Just a lot of Trump is a disaster talk. That doesn’t win campaigns...got to have some vision as well.


90 posted on 04/23/2016 7:11:57 AM PDT by ripnbang ("An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man a subject)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie2001

You are 100 percent correct and I could not have said it any better


91 posted on 04/23/2016 7:15:49 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him. He got them and now we have to pay the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Dan in Wichita
Here is a link to one of the earliest citations of the quote. Who is the "they" Trump is alluding to?

washingtonpost.com

"Donald Trump: They say I could ‘shoot somebody’ and still have support"]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/01/23/donald-trump-i-could-shoot-somebody-and-still-have-support/

92 posted on 04/23/2016 7:15:52 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
 photo Trump_Tower-image1a_zpsmcwttpio.jpg
93 posted on 04/23/2016 7:18:37 AM PDT by topspinr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Presumptive means absolutely zilch until he is declared the nominee and the same goes for Hillary Rotten Clinton


94 posted on 04/23/2016 7:22:58 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him. He got them and now we have to pay the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Dan in Wichita

By the way, if you insist on insulting me, do it on the board like a man, not in a FReepmail, like a coward.


95 posted on 04/23/2016 7:23:52 AM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter
You see this in Cruz’ supporters, too. It’s no longer about even the vague wonderful things Cruz would do; it’s about how terrible Trump is. I’m no expert, but I doubt anyone ever won a presidential primary based on how much they hate the other guy.

I see Cruz's support as stemming from emotions. He crafted an image based on the most "conservative" stereotypes, and uses that persona to try to create "warm fuzzies" among his followers--but says little about policy or how, exactly, he's going to create this wonderful world that he's promising.

His campaign is actually very liberal in that many liberals campaign on promises of utopia, with few specifics on how they will perform in office. Liberal campaigns, too, rely on hate-mongering and avoid talking about issues. It is no wonder that Cruz is being rejected.

96 posted on 04/23/2016 7:24:43 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: greene66
But it wasn’t a Federal law that started this mess. It was Charlotte’s doing. The state law was to remedy that. Although so many so-called ‘conservatives’ seem to be taking more umbrage over that latter attempt to rectify the situation than the original pro-pervert city law.

Looking at it too short-sighted. It was all the hate crimes/protection of minorities - no matter what made them a minority/and other Federal edicts that kept overstepping the Constitution and the People in the States that caused the latest row. Every time a State tries to use it's powers of jurisdiction given them by the 10th Amendment, some Federal "Judge" or even SCOTUS then claims Federal Authority trumps what the States and the People want.

Without backtracking some of the "thought control/hate crime/pervs have more rights than normal people laws", we will continue to see this crap happen. Let's face it, it was proven to be a real cluster when the Congress decided it needed to pass a law to say we needed to enforce existing laws in regards to sanctuary cities - the whole system has become so corrupted by so many laws that adding new laws to "supplement/define" existing laws isn't the answer.

That's my story and I'm sticking to it.....

97 posted on 04/23/2016 7:26:59 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Madame Dufarge

I didn’t want to embarrass you, that’s why.


98 posted on 04/23/2016 7:29:13 AM PDT by Dan in Wichita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Dan in Wichita
Full of yourself, aren't you?

But still a coward.

99 posted on 04/23/2016 7:36:07 AM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: be-baw

Yup, gonna crater any day, probably by this time tomorrow.


100 posted on 04/23/2016 7:38:20 AM PDT by going hot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-177 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson