Posted on 04/14/2016 6:37:15 PM PDT by mystery-ak
If there is one thing you can count on, it is salacious sex stories to explode all over the internet ; especially so if those stories seem to involve a politician. Leave it to David Corn at the ever so not reliable Mother Jones to find a way to take a 10th Amendment versus Interstate Commerce case that Ted Cruz did not author, and make it appear he wrote every word within it.
(Excerpt) Read more at gopbriefingroom.com ...
Pffft!
What has become of this place?
Ain’t that the truth!!
We are all Alex Jones now.
Ted chose to champion state rights in a case where the state was making a ridiculous intrusion into people’s privacy.
Ted chose to champion state rights in a case where the state was making a ridiculous intrusion into people’s privacy.
Why should I give a click to another forum??????
David Corn at Mother Jones has become a respected source for news on FR when you want to attack someone running for President that you don't like.
Apparently that is what has become of this place.
So the fedguv should regulate sex toys and marriage?
Here, let me copy and paste you the main point....
In the end, Texas lost this case and did not appeal, which says even more about the Attorney General’s office position on this case. All of the static aside, reviewing the documents from a legal, versus political tabloid perspective, one can conclude:
1. Ted Cruz did not author this brief, argue this brief, or sign off as the attorney of record on this brief.
2. The State Attorney General’s office role was not to make a judgment of opinion on the law itself, but to defend the law as currently written until the State Legislature changes it.
3. Much of the tabloid salaciousness presented in articles about this brief were merely lawyers attempting to somehow write legal and Constitutional context into what would be a touchy subject.
Maybe if David Corn had his mind more on the truth and less on political tabloid hits, he would have presented a more honest assessment of this non-issue.
Cruz argued that the State had a right to ban sex toys.
+1
LOL
Well done.
Articles like this will make you go blind.
“Thee was a time when these kind of articles were considered trash and would not be tolerated”.
Teddy the Self-rightous begs ridicule.
Actually he didn’t. But I will ask you again. Is marriage a fedguv issue. Was Lawrence rightly decided? Is their an inalienable right to dildoes?
Birthers are morons. As are those conspiracy theorists who claim Bush knew about 9/11 beforehand. Like Mr. Trump.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
