Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America's Lethal New B-21 vs. the B-2 Stealth Bomber
The National Interest ^ | 29 Feb, 2016 | Dave Majumdar

Posted on 02/29/2016 4:48:09 PM PST by MtnClimber

With the U.S. Air Force revealing concept art and a designation for its shadowy Northrop Grumman B-21 Long Range Strike-Bomber (LRS-B) last week, there are many details that we can now glean about the new warplane. First and foremost, the new B-21 looks very similar to its B-2 Spirit predecessor. In fact, the new aircraft look startlingly similar to the original Advanced Strategic Penetration Aircraft (ASPA) and the later Advanced Technology Bomber concept from the 1980s that ultimately resulted in the B-2. But the Spirit was redesigned late in the game to operate at low altitudes after Dr. Paul Kaminski's-current chairman of the Defense Science Board-Red Team cautioned that the B-2 might have to resort to low-level penetration as the Soviets built new, more capable radars-as legendary Aviation Week journalist Bill Sweetman points out in his book "Inside the Stealth Bomber." The redesign caused a decrease in range and payload, as well as a larger radar cross-section.

If the current B-21 design is truly representative of the direction the Air Force is taking, the new aircraft will take the B-2's all-aspect stealth design to the next level. Particularly, the B-21's low observable design will be more effective against low frequency radars operating in the UHF and VHF bands, which are increasingly coming into vogue as a means to counter stealth aircraft.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalinterest.org ...


TOPICS: Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: aerospace; aviation; stealthbomber

1 posted on 02/29/2016 4:48:09 PM PST by MtnClimber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

That would be impressive coming over low.


2 posted on 02/29/2016 4:48:41 PM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Would they name it the Obomber?


3 posted on 02/29/2016 4:50:06 PM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult (Liberals make unrealistic demands on reality and reality doesn't oblige them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult

More likely the Baraq-21


4 posted on 02/29/2016 4:51:49 PM PST by nascarnation (RIP Scalia. Godspeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

Not long qgo, a F16 bested an F35. Lets hope they got this one right.


5 posted on 02/29/2016 4:59:47 PM PST by Sasparilla (Hillary for Prosecution 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Large, expensive bombers in an environment of inexpensive drones makes no sense. A hundred small targets are more survivable than one large target.


6 posted on 02/29/2016 5:04:05 PM PST by ryan71 (Bibles, Beans and Bullets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
That would be impressive coming over low.

That's General "Buck" Turgidson speaking!

7 posted on 02/29/2016 5:04:23 PM PST by llevrok (To liberals, Treason Is the New Patriotism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla

My SIL works on the F35.
Let’s just say it’s a “jobs program” for engineers LOL


8 posted on 02/29/2016 5:08:04 PM PST by nascarnation (RIP Scalia. Godspeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ryan71

Manned bombers are harder to hack than drones. And if they’re carrying nukes they can be recalled right until the moment the weapon is released.


9 posted on 02/29/2016 5:09:24 PM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Vaporware.


10 posted on 02/29/2016 5:10:35 PM PST by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca

Yes, it’s a bit early to label it “Lethal” - still in the early design stages and all. Let’s see one built, first.


11 posted on 02/29/2016 5:32:34 PM PST by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca

And unobtanium construction?

CC


12 posted on 02/29/2016 5:35:19 PM PST by Celtic Conservative (CC: purveyor of cryptic, snarky posts since December, 2000..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ryan71

I agree.


13 posted on 02/29/2016 5:35:24 PM PST by BBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Will never leave the drawing board.

We already have the last manned US strategic bombers.


14 posted on 02/29/2016 6:02:31 PM PST by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Something to consider boys and girls, if they are willing to show us these new weapons, imagine what else they have...glad I’m on our side.


15 posted on 02/29/2016 6:25:42 PM PST by Rumplemeyer (The GOP should stand its ground - and fix Bayonets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

North American XB-21

16 posted on 02/29/2016 7:01:40 PM PST by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

17 posted on 02/29/2016 8:31:01 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult

The AF is going to solicit requests from the enlisted force to give the new bomber a name that honors all enlisted. I wonder if they should name it the “Sergeant.”


18 posted on 03/01/2016 7:22:11 AM PST by ops33 (Senior Master Sergeant, USAF (Retired))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla

Related:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3403655/posts?page=9#9


19 posted on 03/01/2016 7:24:14 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ (Cruz=VAT tax= No thanks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel

There is a rumor one is already in testing at Groom Lake.


20 posted on 03/01/2016 7:28:53 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ (Cruz=VAT tax= No thanks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson