You’re focusing on Cruz’ 4% lead over Trump, and my thoughts were actually more as to why everybody was so wrong about RUBIO!
I don’t dispute ground game. I gave the other reasons why I think everyone might have been off. That’s all.
Gaffer said: “You’re focusing on Cruz’ 4% lead over Trump, and my thoughts were actually more as to why everybody was so wrong about RUBIO!”
Good point, it could be that Rubio had the best “ground game” of them all. Regardless, I think that it can be said that Trump better work on his ground game if he wants to translate leads in polls to wins. Something was obviously missing there in Iowa. That is, if the point is to “win”, and we know that seems important to Trump.
Rubio already has a hold on Cruz’s ankles and is climbing in New Hampshire, so obviously he should not be underestimated.
...and my thoughts were actually more as to why everybody was so wrong about RUBIO!
*******************************
Another FReeper posted Tue. night something to the effect that Hillary figured she had Iowa in the bag so they had many of her supporters cross over and vote for Rubio, presumably because he would be easier to beat and to cut into the momentum both Cruz and Trump have.
That’s not what the FReeper posted, but JMO of what it meant.