Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

This Should Settle Cruz Eligibilty for the Trump Tribe
Washington Times ^ | 1/13/2016 | Susan Carleson

Posted on 01/13/2016 3:46:46 PM PST by conservativejoy

Edited on 01/13/2016 4:06:16 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-239 last
To: dforest

>>Lets see it!
I will agree with you that he should release it.


221 posted on 01/14/2016 6:07:51 AM PST by libertylover (The problem with Obama is not that his skin is too black, it's that his ideas are too RED.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative
Not until after 1907. Prior to that an immigrant woman who married a US citizen did not automatically become a citizen, and there was little practical reason for them to become naturalized. They couldn't vote, couldn't hold property in their own names, etc., and naturalization was a fairly expensive process. So you cannot presume that they were citizens just by virtue of their marriages.

One of us is mistaken about this. My recollection is that the naturalization of wives into their husbands nationality was common law since before the country began, and sometime in the latter half of the 19th century, Congress passed a statute law that made it official US law.

Read the section at this link entitled "Derivative citizenship." Specifically the part that says:

"any woman who might lawfully be naturalized under existing laws, married, or shall be married to a citizen of the United States, shall be deemed and taken to be a citizen."[Act of February 10, 1855, 10 Stat. 604, section 2]

That law is also cited in this court case.

The effect of this law was only ameliorated in 1922 with the passage of the "Cable act."

222 posted on 01/14/2016 7:33:23 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot2

Synonyms for natural
adj normal, everyday

common
essential
innate
instinctive
legitimate
logical
ordinary
reasonable
usual

characteristic
commonplace
constant
familiar
general
natal
native
probable
regular

uniform
universal
accustomed
anticipated
congenital
connatural
consistent
counted on
customary

habitual
inborn
indigenous
ingenerate
inherent
intuitive
involuntary
looked for
matter-of-course

prevailing
prevalent
relied on
spontaneous
typic
typical
unacquired
uncontrolled


223 posted on 01/14/2016 11:04:07 AM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heat

Native Indigenous

The Founders language was Middle English or Upper Middle English

“yearnings to be with her own natural kind” William Wordsworth


224 posted on 01/14/2016 12:01:41 PM PST by bushpilot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

“He was born in Hawaii, so it’s a moot point.”

Obama was not born in Hawaai. Obama’s alleged birth certificate is a crude forgery created in a computer by cutting and pasting images. The fact that Obama had to create a forgery for a fake birth certificate indicates he was not born in Hawaii. Even if Obama had been born in Hawaii, he is still not a natural born citizen, because his father was an alien and his mother was an underage U.S. citizen who was too young to transmit her U.S. citizenship to her children; so he would have been born as a native born and not a natural born citizen. Because Obama was not born in the United States and his mother was too young to transmit her U.S. citizenship to her children, Obama is not a legitimate U.S. citizen of any kind, and he is a foreigner.


225 posted on 01/14/2016 12:02:47 PM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: amihow

.
It has been interpreted by the early congresses, and that is all that matters.

Vague terms never make legal precedent.

Keep straining your gnats, and swallowing your camels.
.


226 posted on 01/14/2016 12:10:20 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot2
You can beat that horse all day long, but it's still dead. If the assumptions about John Jay are true, in that he is responsible for the term natural born in the final draft, then it follows that he had a definition in mind but we do not know what it is and there were differing ideas at the time.

What we do know is that Jay had two foreign born children.

So what do you think he meant by it, assuming he was responsible for the use of the term? Would you not think that Jay understood that his natural born status was transferred to his children, or that he knowingly shortchanged his own kids status.

227 posted on 01/14/2016 12:10:50 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

I think his Mother was 18 when he was born.

As far as anyone in power in concerned, he was born in Hawaii, so again it’s a moot point.

His Mother could pas on Citizenship without the 4-5 Year Residency Requirement because he was Born on U.S. Soil.

I don’t like it and obviously you don’t like it either, but it’s just the way it is. That Ship has sailed.


228 posted on 01/14/2016 12:11:58 PM PST by Kickass Conservative (Get the CDS and TDS Vaccines before it's too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot2
The Founders language was Middle English or Upper Middle English

To carry that same point further, they also existed at a time when women were not able to contract, and essentially had no legal status. This interpretation has morphed over time. At the time of John Jay, status had to be transferred from the father. but I don't see you arguing that. I wonder why not, if the definition and meaning of terms and phrases are so important to your assertions.

The truth of it is and I have said this for support of my case, is that the interpretation I am using is modern or better said 20th century, not the 16th.

As you should know, Constitutional interpretations employ a number of techniques, including Textualism, Strict Constructionalism, Originalism, Balancing, Prudentialism, Doctrinalism, Precedent, and Functionalism.

You are making a argument from only one perspective. Which is why I disagree.

229 posted on 01/14/2016 12:38:19 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heat

1758 Vattro Chapter XIX

Natives Indigenous


230 posted on 01/14/2016 12:43:10 PM PST by bushpilot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot2

Vattel


231 posted on 01/14/2016 12:44:00 PM PST by bushpilot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Congress and SCOTUS have made egregious mistakes.

Black’s Law dictionary stands on the wisdom of centuries of English Common Law. It is not vague language. It is clear and precise. A natural born citizen is a person born in the land where he IS a citizen.


232 posted on 01/14/2016 12:57:55 PM PST by amihow (l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot2
Natives Indigenous

lol.....but you repeat yourself....hahaha

233 posted on 01/14/2016 2:03:06 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heat

https://vermonthistory.org/journal/misc/MysteryOfChester.pdf


234 posted on 01/14/2016 2:23:37 PM PST by bushpilot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot2

I have already addressed this without saying the name. It’s a similar argument. There were 2 sides to it then and now.


235 posted on 01/14/2016 2:26:34 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot2

Speaking of the 2- sided argument, often 3-4 sides as it is now, I do think that to cure this problem, we can address it in the hopefully coming Convention of the States.

The entire basis/purpose/need for the “natural born” wording was to prevent foreign powers (british and French) from taking advantage of our open elections and exploiting the rules.

That fear was somewhat justified largely because of the mood of the time and the fight for independence still warm.

Understanding that, it would be a real stretch to think that a child born of a natural born American was some sort of security threat.

This is a major part of the argument against your accusations.

In view of the fact that women now have constitutionally equal legal standing, the Vatel view that citizenship has to come from the father is totally moot. Couple that with the fact that this sort of citizenship transference from a American parent to a foreign born child due purely to the place and time, could not be a security issue, and you have the basis of my understanding.

It’s better for you that you understand my point, yet continue to disagree and not dismiss me out of hand, because I am not alone in this. Thus far I see no inkling of understanding.


236 posted on 01/14/2016 2:42:44 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: Safrguns

“I think he sold out to the dems a long time ago, making his birthplace irrelevant.”

Yes, there is that.


237 posted on 01/14/2016 3:00:43 PM PST by ought-six (Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heat
"How an alien may become a citizen"  photo image_zpsliej7jip.jpeg
238 posted on 01/14/2016 4:07:18 PM PST by bushpilot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

“As far as anyone in power in concerned, he was born in Hawaii, so again it’s a moot point.”

It will never be a moot point, because it will have consequences one way or the other. We have not forgotten the Alamo. We won’t forget or forgive this betrayal of America and its Constitution. There are a lot of people and a lot of reputations which can suffer as a consequence of these egregious acts of corruption.

“His Mother could pas on Citizenship without the 4-5 Year Residency Requirement because he was Born on U.S. Soil.”

They went to a lot of trouble to clean out the State Department passport files and assassinate the investigating D.C. police officer just to cover up the fact Obama was not born in Hawaii or anywhere else in the United States. There is no statute of limitation on murder or the conspiracy to commit murder. When they and the GOPe lose power and control in D.C. to people like the Oathkeepers, the chickens may come home to roost in a very unremorseful way. The game is not over until you quit, including after you are dead and your dead hand keeps on keepin on.

“I don’t like it and obviously you don’t like it either, but it’s just the way it is. That Ship has sailed.”

Not by a long shot.


239 posted on 01/14/2016 7:20:17 PM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-239 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson