Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Guest Speechless After Jesse Watters Asks: "Has Ex-President Bill Clinton Abused Women?"
FOX News ^ | December 30, 2015

Posted on 12/30/2015 1:30:57 PM PST by presidio9

Jesse Watters, guest-hosting "The O'Reilly Factor," asked Fox News contributor Leslie Marshall whether or not former President Bill Clinton has "abused" women but she was left speechless before she was able to give an answer.

"I think your silence says a lot," Watters said.

But Marshall shot back, "No. I wanted to be very clear because I wanted to think about Monica - although consensual, she was young. I wouldn't say abuse - taken advantage of? Yes. Abused? No."

Watters listed off the facts, "Two women have accused Bill Clinton of sexual assault. Another woman sued Clinton for defamation because he allegedly smeared her after an affair, and, you know as you said, he did prey on a young intern while at work. And he did use state troopers while at office to arrange the relationships. And then we know that he used his political attack machine to go after whistleblowers of the women who accused him of doing the wrong thing. It looks like there is a track record of being very aggressive with women and then using political power to then cover it up and smear. Am I wrong," Watters asked.

Marshall took the opportunity to give Bill Clinton a pass saying,

(Excerpt) Read more at nation.foxnews.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: billclinton; clintonsexabuse; dna; impeachment; jessewatters; perjury; pervert; x42
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

1 posted on 12/30/2015 1:30:57 PM PST by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Taking advantage of = Abuse. End of story.


2 posted on 12/30/2015 1:34:32 PM PST by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I laughed out very loud when I saw this segment...Watters nailed her.


3 posted on 12/30/2015 1:34:57 PM PST by Cuttnhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

BJ Clinton settled the Paula Jones case for six figures (and was disbarred for five years because of how he handled it); Paula Jones wasn’t a girlfriend, but a victim of sexual harassment/flashing at the hands of Clinton.

Leftists try to focus the story on Monica (a consensual if disgusting “indiscretion”) to distract attention from the fact that Monica was subpoenaed AS PART OF PAULA JONES’ LAWSUIT. Paula Jones cast the Monica relationship in the spotlight - and she was an innocent victim of The Great Stain-Maker.


4 posted on 12/30/2015 1:34:57 PM PST by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I was impressed with Watters, I always saw him as a lighyt weight-—He proved his chops that night and from his tone—he may well be a Trump supprter.


5 posted on 12/30/2015 1:35:18 PM PST by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll Onward! Ride to the sound of the guns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

I like Watters. His style is very disarming.


6 posted on 12/30/2015 1:35:21 PM PST by chopperman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I could only hope ditzy broads like Leslie Marshall could find themselves alone with a sexual pervert like Slick Willie.

Then she’d know without a doubt what “abused” means.


7 posted on 12/30/2015 1:36:25 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (With Great Freedom comes Great Responsibility)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I would hope she would think about Juanita, Kathleen and Paula.

Women don’t fabricate these charges, because of the stress it causes them.

Except when there is a political damage.


8 posted on 12/30/2015 1:36:42 PM PST by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
They have no good answers for Clinton's behavior. None.

Clinton had to pay Paula Jones $850,000 to settle out of court and if my memory serves, Trump at that time, said something like, "you don't pay 850 grand if you're innocent."

9 posted on 12/30/2015 1:37:02 PM PST by Zuben Elgenubi (NOPe to GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Young Dem Barbie: "I used to date Bill Clinton,
                      but now I'm into consensual sex."
10 posted on 12/30/2015 1:37:54 PM PST by sparklite2 ( "The white man is the Jew of Liberal Fascism." -Jonah Goldberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Yes, and Hillary is at least an accessory after the fact due to her part in smearing and sliming the women.


11 posted on 12/30/2015 1:38:04 PM PST by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

Well, it was between two consenting adults, but considering that Bubba was her boss...very, very bad. In the private sector, that is INSTANT, AUTOMATIC firing, doesn’t matter who you are. Then, the company itself has problems from the Feds on top of that.


12 posted on 12/30/2015 1:39:06 PM PST by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Trump pre-emptively thwarts sexual smears that were certain to come his way from the Clinton camp.

Trump has had a lot of wives and girlfriends.

But no accusations of abuse like Clinton.

If Clintons want to use Trump’s tomcatting ways against him, Trump has a big one up on Clinton because tom-catting is not rape and sexual assault.

Game to Trump, opponent forfeits.


13 posted on 12/30/2015 1:40:11 PM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chopperman

“I like Watters. His style is very disarming.”

He smiles when he punches.


14 posted on 12/30/2015 1:40:12 PM PST by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi
See left wing analysis from Slate posted HERE.

Excerpt:

"But our rules for talking about sexual assault have changed since the 1990s, when these women were last in the news. Today, feminists have repeatedly and convincingly made the case that when women say they’ve been sexually assaulted, we should assume they’re telling the truth. Particularly when it comes to Broaddrick, it's not easy to square the arguments against believing her with the dominant progressive consensus on trusting victims. This is a tension that people on the right are eager to exploit."

Indeed.

15 posted on 12/30/2015 1:40:17 PM PST by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cuttnhorse

Watters is a scream. I love that look he gives someone when he’s setting them up for a fall.

Which is often


16 posted on 12/30/2015 1:42:59 PM PST by A_Former_Democrat (If you're "offended" by "Merry Christmas" then you have much bigger issues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

most

entertaining

election

ever


17 posted on 12/30/2015 1:43:37 PM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

It’s only abuse if a white conservative male does it. Otherwise, it’s ok.


18 posted on 12/30/2015 1:43:48 PM PST by Roger Kaputnik (Just because I'm paranoid doesn't prove that they aren't out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie

“Better put some ice on that, Leslie”


19 posted on 12/30/2015 1:44:45 PM PST by rickomatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie

See # 4; that is the REAL story (and problem) for BJ Clinton. Don’t take the left’s bait by focusing on Monica; she was a pawn in a much bigger problem.


20 posted on 12/30/2015 1:45:14 PM PST by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson