Posted on 12/01/2015 5:54:42 AM PST by wtd
An exceptional essay, discussing the primary forces at work against society
Matthew Bracken is the author of Enemies Foreign and Domestic, and a well-known advocate for Second Amendment rights. The following guest-essay by Mr. Bracken is also being published at Western Rifle Shooters Association.
As we roll into the New Year, we are witnessing the prelude to the culmination of a titanic struggle between three great actors. Three great social forces are now set in motion for a 2016 showdown and collision that will, in historical terms, be on par with the First and Second World Wars.
Two of these great social forces are currently allied in a de facto coalition against the third. They have forged an unwritten agreement to jointly murder the weakest of the three forces while it is in their combined power to do so. One of these two social forces would be content to share totalitarian control over large swaths of the globe with the other remaining social force. One of these social forces will never be satisfied until it achieves complete domination of the entire planet. So what are these three great social forces? They are Islam, international socialism, and nationalism.
Mr. Bracken explain[s] the salient aspects of each, and how they relate to the coming 2016 cataclysm...in his 9k word essay [pasted in the first comment below].
Some comments added by Matt Bracken to readers at Gates of Vienna offer some teasers:
"Now is crunch time. And let me say this while it’s on my mind: Obama wants to accelerate the schedule so that WW3 will initiate on his watch, so that he can sabotage the West most effectively. I have no doubt the shoot down of the Russian jet was roughly coordinated between Obama and Erdogan. They want this to happen while Obama can scuttle our military, etc.
"I think Islam just swallows Socialism in the end. Socialists say the Shahada, after they are promised some sop like calling the new regime “Islamic Socialism†or some such twaddle. Socialist leaders, (paid off or blackmailed by threats), will advise all their little socialist minions to submit to Islam, and they will."
"Mr. Bracken is absolutely correct about the matter of intentionality.
If European leaders wanted to close the land and sea routes to Europe, they could but do not. Navies are humiliated by being ordered to serve as taxi services.
If they wanted to search each invader they could but don’t.
If they wanted to stop generating refugees, they could stop attacking Assad but don’t.
If they wanted to stop generating refugees, they could starve ISIS financially by insisting SA and Qatar stop funding them, by insisting Turkey stop supplying them and buying oil from them, and by destroying refineries and oil transport trucks, but they don’t.
If they were interested in helping refugees, they could help 25 in place for what it costs to help one inside Europe but the only alternative announced is importation.
If they wanted to preserve Europe, refugees could be told they will be returned to their homes after the wars are ended but they aren’t.
If they wanted to protect their citizens, they could allow them to speak out against their Muslim enemy and arm themselves, but they do not. Dissent and plainly true words are ruthlessly punished.
European leaders promulgate contemptible lies about Islam that no honest person can embrace. The treason of these lying, vicious swine is complete and total.' - Col. Bunny
To which Matt Bracken responds:
"You and I see eye to eye."
Because the enemy won’t be trying to hold territory, there will be no front lines, etc.
Tet 2016 will be even more Wild West than Tet 1968.
How dearly the purple-lipped princess would love to lay this plan over the continent, but the frog will surely jump the pot right now.
The angle here will have to be something even more ridiculous than islam. My bet is on climate change.
The prospect of nuking Mecca and the aftermath is certainly worth exploring in more detail. Would that act foster great depression in the muslim community or hurl them into blind rage? Either would likely be to our advantage. Depressing them might cause the muslims to crawl back into their sand holes and disappear. Rage would reveal them as easy killing targets for organized armies.
What’s your opinion?
I would like to read this as well.
Matt’s, “Tet Take Two,” Essay hits the nail on the head.
Tet, Take Two: Islam’s 2016 European Offensive
http://gatesofvienna.net/2015/11/tet-take-two-islams-2016-european-offensive/
Far too many people will be uncomfortable with it because they cannot imagine such things happening...but they are not living out the horrors that are occurring in Europe and which represent the initial incoming tide of what Matt describes.
I have talked to many friends in Europe and the beginnings are all there...and the three factions he describes are all in play in spades.
Heck, the very idea of various countries banning Matt’s essay in some countries in Europe now is simply more evidence of the same.
In the end, in this nation, as Matt says, our Constitution and Bill of rights, particularly buttressed by the second amendment can be our salvation...and I will add a 3rd, which he inferred in the essay.
“Thank God.”
As Matt says, thank God in Heaven. He is aware of all of this, and He has telegraphed the end game of it to all of us.
As Patrick Henry said...and I believe that he and other founders who attributed what they did to Him were correct...”There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations.”
That remains true in 2016 just as it did in 1776.
The combination of our reliance on Him, of our defending our unalienable rights with the weapons we have, and our continued liberal use of our free speech to point out what is happening and warn and educate others, will allow us to carry the day.
IMHO, it will take all three of those, exercised in great abundance to do so.
Let me connect some dots from relatively recent past...
How the press reported it:
It is alleged Mr Khan joined a fight involving his son, Azir Saddique, and Mr Brown and then fatally stabbed him. Mr Khan and Mr Saddique also deny unlawful wounding
Khan, who both worshipped and taught at his local mosque, was found guilty of manslaughter by reason of lack of intent. (despite his claims of 5 years of torment?)
read like a parody of Tet 2?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.