Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Enlightened1

For the record too. If we were deploying ground troops there. We would need more than that.

I have heard the actual number of troops would be from anywhere between as low as 150k up to a max of 450k U.S. troops. That would be for the foreseeable future too. Well that is if we did not get into a nuclear conflict with Russia.


5 posted on 11/16/2015 12:18:03 AM PST by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Enlightened1

I would require the establishment or capture of a Mediterranean port which would then require protection of one or more air bases and several perimeter ground bases. From there, it would require the constant engagement of ISIS with the intent to DESTROY them. Not to capture or contain. Decimation of their forces and any and all that support them. Collateral damage be damned.

This is NOT supported by left who will be screaming about how we are cowardly, cruel, unfair. etc. So the first battle will be for the will of the American people.


6 posted on 11/16/2015 12:32:59 AM PST by taxcontrol ( The GOPe treats the conservative base like slaves by taking their votes and refuses to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

500k troops, start in Iraq “again” and wipe out everything within a 1000 miles, set up a some massive air fields.

ROE: If it moves kill it.

No journalist or news agencies allowed.


21 posted on 11/16/2015 2:14:14 AM PST by maddog55 (America Rising a new Civil War needs to happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson