Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

World’s Largest Containership Also Sets Record for Largest Engine Ever
gcaptain ^ | November 20, 2014 | Mike Shuler

Posted on 10/28/2015 1:40:54 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER

With a capacity to carry 19,000 TEUs, the recently named MV CSCL Globe is the world’s largest containership by cargo capacity. But that’s not all it’s known for. The newbuild for China Shipping Container Lines is also noteworthy for being powered by what is physically the largest engine ever constructed.

(Excerpt) Read more at gcaptain.com ...


TOPICS: Education; Miscellaneous; Science
KEYWORDS: engine; ship
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 10/28/2015 1:40:54 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

All that effort and a freaking Honda civic would wax it in a 1/4 mile.


2 posted on 10/28/2015 1:49:36 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart (Embrace "Existential Cage Theory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

Yeah, but I’d like to see that Civic pull a loaded train and not break a sweat ;)


3 posted on 10/28/2015 2:04:20 AM PDT by Crazieman (Article V or National Divorce. The only solutions now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

How much does an oil change cost?


4 posted on 10/28/2015 2:13:00 AM PDT by Paladin2 (my non-desktop devices are no longer allowed to try to fix speling and punctuation, nor my gran-mah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Hah, didn’t think of that. Probably measured in barrels.


5 posted on 10/28/2015 2:16:08 AM PDT by Crazieman (Article V or National Divorce. The only solutions now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman

I couldn’t decide between barrels and drums....


6 posted on 10/28/2015 2:17:43 AM PDT by Paladin2 (my non-desktop devices are no longer allowed to try to fix speling and punctuation, nor my gran-mah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

If it sails into a typhoon the hull stresses will be something else. I wonder how good the Chinese engineering is


7 posted on 10/28/2015 2:35:59 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Big polluters: one massive container ship equals 50 million cars
Paul Evans
April 23, 2009
http://www.gizmag.com/shipping-pollution/11526/

There are 90,000 cargo ships in the world.
There are 760 million cars in the world.
15 of the largest ships emit as much Sulphur Oxides as the 760 million cars of the world.
The largest ships have two cycle engines 5 stories tall and use 16 tons of dirty fuel per hour as they travel just 30 mph across the globe.
These ship engines produce 114,800 horse power or 90 MW.
A city of 100,000 homes uses 100 MW
Ships contribute half of the pollution in Los Angeles
There are 150 nuclear ships in the world. A Nimitz class supercarrier produces 240,000 hp, 208 MW, or enough power for 208,000 homes and can go 20 years without refueling.
A wind farm the size of Texas, California and New Mexico is required to power the U.S.
In 1967 Los Angeles we had 855,000 employees in manufacturing.
In 2014 we had 349,532 manufacturing employees.


8 posted on 10/28/2015 3:19:23 AM PDT by Haddit (Minimalists Al Gore and Al Qaeda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine
I wonder how good the Chinese engineering is

No idea - but I have a gut response to that...

Would much rather see them (and all ships) use multiple engines instead of one huge monster motor...

9 posted on 10/28/2015 3:24:07 AM PDT by grobdriver (Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

http://www.marinetraffic.com/ais/details/ships/shipid:993261/mmsi:477712400/imo:9695121/vessel:cscl_glob

10 posted on 10/28/2015 3:30:26 AM PDT by ETL (Ted Cruz 2016!! -- For a better and safer America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Haddit

Surprising the Chinese did not go to nuclear to power this ship.

Annual fuel costs alone would make for a very quick payback.

And if a uranium-fueled nuclear generation plant is too large and complex for cargo ship use, then build and install a thorium-fueled Molten-Salt generation plant. They can be both much smaller and more flexible than the light-water plant.

And the technology is currently available.

A fleet of such cargo ships would DOMINATE the world shipping lanes, because per-unit shipping costs would be sharply lower, and speed of transport could be conceivably somewhat quicker, as turnaround at the port is limited only by loading and unloading capabilities - no refueling time for YEARS.


11 posted on 10/28/2015 3:31:59 AM PDT by alloysteel (Do not argue with trolls. That means they win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER; All

Check out this supersized high res image: 3,836 × 2,448 pixels

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b3/MV_CSCL_Mercury_R01.jpg


12 posted on 10/28/2015 3:40:07 AM PDT by ETL (Ted Cruz 2016!! -- For a better and safer America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
A fleet of such cargo ships would DOMINATE the world shipping lanes, because per-unit shipping costs would be sharply lower, and speed of transport could be conceivably somewhat quicker, as turnaround at the port is limited only by loading and unloading capabilities - no refueling time for YEARS.

And would be targets of terrorists for decades who wanted to get ahold of nuclear material for dirty bombs. Or just make the cargo ship a dirty bomb and blow the reactor while unloading in Long Beach, CA.

13 posted on 10/28/2015 3:44:02 AM PDT by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Too bad they have nothing to ship these days.

Their shipping index is horrible.


14 posted on 10/28/2015 3:45:59 AM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Probably won’t fit in place of my VW TDI.


15 posted on 10/28/2015 3:48:37 AM PDT by Wingy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

It’s amazing how disastrous these ships have been from a financial perspective. Building ships like this adds so much capacity to the shipping industry that the shipping rates are depressed ... which means the companies that operate these ships have a hard time recovering the cost of building them.


16 posted on 10/28/2015 3:56:02 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("It doesn't work for me. I gotta have more cowbell!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

Is this ready for Commercially ready for Prime time?
And is anything with molten sodium in a harsh corrosive marine water environment, a good idea?
(I know it would supposedly be a closed loop system)

RE: “thorium-fueled Molten-Salt generation plant.”


17 posted on 10/28/2015 3:57:24 AM PDT by MarchonDC09122009 (When is our next march on DC? When have we had enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Container ship diesel drive systems are linked to the propellers thru a transmission system. Surprising that they have not yet evolved to a diesel electric system similar to locomotives where the diesel engine is used to generate electric power.


18 posted on 10/28/2015 4:10:59 AM PDT by Flick Lives (One should not attend even the end of the world without a good breakfast. -- Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER
Excellent article on Reuters last month about the economics of megaships. The numbers are truly astounding. Article explains how shippers optimize their fleets according to fuel cost. Insurers are projecting the collision of two megaships would cost them $1B to $2B! That's a lot of stuff on two ships.

Megaships are worsening overcapacity in the container market

19 posted on 10/28/2015 4:17:27 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not, no explanation is possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER
"Largest engine ever"? Hardly. That's not a midget at the lower left of this pic. You wouldn't believe the size of the largest supercritical boilers. Of course, they are hard to squeeze into a ship engine room and you really don't need an 80 knot megaship.


20 posted on 10/28/2015 4:31:06 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not, no explanation is possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson