Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: Playboy Will No Longer Publish Nude Photos (Yes, you read that right)
NBC News ^ | Oct 13, 2015 | Reuters News Service

Posted on 10/12/2015 9:36:18 PM PDT by dayglored

Founder and editor-in-chief Hugh Hefner, 89, who in his trademark silk pajamas has embodied the Playboy lifestyle, agreed last month with a suggestion by top editor Cory Jones to stop publishing images of naked women, the Times said.

At a time when every teenage boy has an Internet connected phone and the web is rife with pornography, the magazine has opted to continue featuring women in provocative poses, just not completely nude, the Times said.

"You're now one click away from every sex act imaginable for free," Flanders was quoted as saying in the Times. "And so it's just passe at this juncture."

The magazine that featured Marilyn Monroe on its debut cover in 1953 is making the changes after circulation dropped from 5.6 million in 1975 to about 800,000 now, the Times said.

After its initial success, the magazine was attacked from the political right because of the nudity and from the left by feminists who said it reduced women to sex objects.

Some changes are still under debate, including whether there will continue to be a centerfold. Playboy magazine's sex columnist will be a woman, who writes enthusiastically about sex, Jones told the Times.

The magazine has always had intellectual appeal with top writers such as Kurt Vonnegut, Joyce Carol Oates, Vladimir Nabokov, James Baldwin and Alex Haley for men who liked to say they did not buy the magazine just for the pictures.

...

(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...


TOPICS: Books/Literature; Business/Economy; Society
KEYWORDS: hughhefner; napl; nude; playboy; porn; pr0n
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-147 next last
To: dayglored

This proves that anything can reach a point of being overexposed. Your tolerance level is ratched up way too high.
Just call this the Neo-Roaring 20s.


21 posted on 10/12/2015 9:55:13 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

He needs to do a sex pose with his shrived up penis.


22 posted on 10/12/2015 9:56:00 PM PDT by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

I guess this means Staple Placement will no longer be an issue for Playboy “readers”.


23 posted on 10/12/2015 9:56:03 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (THEY LIVE, and we're the only ones wearing the Sunglasses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Remember, a few years ago Hefner admitted that he watches gay pornography movies with his “girlfriends.”


24 posted on 10/12/2015 9:57:16 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: moehoward; dayglored
I always bought it for the articles.

Sure...

I always enjoyed the illustrations by Vargas!


25 posted on 10/12/2015 9:57:22 PM PDT by WVKayaker (On Scale of 1 to 5 Palins, How Likely Is Media Assault on Each GOP Candidate?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MNDude
> ...they once tried to make a magazine for married men— it had the same woman in it every month!

Now THAT's funny, I don't care who you are!

26 posted on 10/12/2015 9:58:23 PM PDT by dayglored ("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

So America has become too decadent even for Playboy.

What a sad commentary on our society.


27 posted on 10/12/2015 9:59:48 PM PDT by GulliverSwift
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WVKayaker
> ... illustrations by Vargas!

The absolute pinnacle. His drawings set a standard that will remain for many decades to come. The stuff of dreams.

28 posted on 10/12/2015 9:59:54 PM PDT by dayglored ("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: o-n-money

Say’s it in the article-down to 800thou.My daughter’s best friend was a centerfold.Bought the issue.Not that impressed.She dated a football player after that-the centerfold.He hung around with my daughter’s crowd till he was transferred.


29 posted on 10/12/2015 10:02:24 PM PDT by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: moehoward; dayglored
I always bought it for the articles.

Sure...

... and the cartoons!


30 posted on 10/12/2015 10:03:28 PM PDT by WVKayaker (On Scale of 1 to 5 Palins, How Likely Is Media Assault on Each GOP Candidate?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

“Playbody without a centerfold is like... like... like... I don’t know. What’s it like???”

Like MAD Magazine without a fold-in back cover?


31 posted on 10/12/2015 10:07:06 PM PDT by howlinhound (Live your life so that, when you get up in the morning, Satan says, "Oh Crap!..He's awake" - Unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative
> Maybe it’s just me, but there is a difference between NUDE and COMPLETELY NUDE.

Eh, I'm not so sure.

Nude these days means (in the case of a woman) that her nipples and crotch are showing with no significant covering.

Breast skin (other than nipples) is not considered "nude". Butts are not considered nude, they even show up on FR.

Is a woman who is completely dressed except that her nipples and crotch are visible considered nude?

The terms become very ambiguous when you dive into the details.

32 posted on 10/12/2015 10:07:29 PM PDT by dayglored ("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: howlinhound
> Like MAD Magazine without a fold-in back cover?

Wow, there's a blast from the past...

33 posted on 10/12/2015 10:09:54 PM PDT by dayglored ("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: moehoward

“I always bought it for the articles.”

Then you should be deliriously happy now because zero nude pics leaves even MORE room for “articles”.


34 posted on 10/12/2015 10:11:29 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative
> I guess this means Staple Placement will no longer be an issue for Playboy “readers”.

Those staples, so cruelly placed in young women's navels by uncaring publishers, were the clearest indication of Playboy's War on Women.

35 posted on 10/12/2015 10:12:15 PM PDT by dayglored ("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

so, pics of naked men then?


36 posted on 10/12/2015 10:13:47 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Na na nananana nananana nanananana...


37 posted on 10/12/2015 10:20:50 PM PDT by uglybiker (nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-BATMAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
> so, pics of naked men then?

That's been done, too.

I read somewhere (and it was mentioned in comment #24) that Hef took to watching gay pr0n in recent years. So I guess ya never know...

38 posted on 10/12/2015 10:21:33 PM PDT by dayglored ("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: moehoward
> I always bought it for the articles.

I remember the Madonna centerfoldback in the '80's. Boy was that disappointing. I remember thinking her armpits were hairier than mine and she had no boobs (to speak of). What was I thinking?

39 posted on 10/12/2015 10:22:20 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

All I know is, I know it when I see it. LOL

At my age, I can’t get lost in the details.


40 posted on 10/12/2015 10:22:21 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (THEY LIVE, and we're the only ones wearing the Sunglasses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson