To: SunkenCiv
Who says we take on noted atheist Neil Tyson and promote Pluto to a planet again!?!
To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
5 posted on
09/25/2015 12:30:27 PM PDT by
fishtank
(The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
Yes, Show that Sizist a thing or two.
6 posted on
09/25/2015 12:31:19 PM PDT by
Shady
(We are at war again......this time for our lives...)
To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
Never understood how an astronomer could be an atheist.
7 posted on
09/25/2015 12:38:28 PM PDT by
lacrew
To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
No reason why a special exception cannot be made for Pluto.
8 posted on
09/25/2015 12:39:29 PM PDT by
kidd
To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton; fishtank; kidd
I'd be surprised if many of the jackasses who voted Pluto off the list would not just as easily vote "climate change deniers" into prison or prison camps. I tell them, be fruitful and multiply -- but not in those exact words.
|
"To Pluto And Far Beyond" By David H. Levy, Parade, January 15, 2006 -- We don't have a dictionary definition yet that includes all the contingencies. In the wake of the new discovery, however, the International Astronomical Union has set up a group to develop a workable definition of planet. For our part, in consultation with several experienced planetary astronomers, Parade offers this definition: A planet is a body large enough that, when it formed, it condensed under its own gravity to be shaped like a sphere. It orbits a star directly and is not a moon of another planet. |
15 posted on
09/25/2015 1:46:14 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson