Posted on 08/21/2015 10:31:46 AM PDT by wtd
On the Influence of the Semitic Races in the History of CivilizationBy Ernest Renan
Posted in The Herald of Progress No. 198,Pages 5 & 6
Dated: December 05, 1863
Select quotes:
"The Arab, at least, and in a more general sense the Mussulman, are today further removed from us than they have ever been. The Mussulman (the Semitic spirit is especially represented in our day by Islam), and the European are, in the presence of one another, two beings of a different species, having nothing in common in their manner of thinking and of feeling. But the march of humanity is owing to the struggle of these contrary tendencies, by a sort of polarization, in virtue of which each idea here below has its exclusive representative. It is in this collectiveness that all contradictions are harmonized, and that a supreme peace results from the clash of elements in appearance enemies. This assumed, if we seek to know what the Semitic race has given to this grand and living organic whole that we call civilization, we shall find that, first, in government, we owe them nothing. Political life is, perhaps, that which the Indo-European have the most indigenous and correct. It is they alone who have understood liberty, who have comprehended at the same time the State with the independence of the individual. "[snip]
"But never among them do we find those centralized despotisms, crushing out all individuality, reducing man to the state of an abstract function without a name, as we see in Egypt, at Babylon, in China and among the Mussulmanic and Tartaric despotisms."
[snip]
"The East, especially the Semitic Orientals, have never known a midway between the completest anarchy of the nomadic Arabs and a despotism at once the most sanguinary and uncompensated. The idea of public policy and public welfare fails to be conceived by these nations."
[snip]
"The ancient Hebrews and the Arabs have been, or are, by moments, the freest of men, but on condition of having a chief the next day to decapitate them at his single pleasure. And whenever this arrives, there is no cry of a violated right"
[snip]
"In science and philosophy we are essentially Greek. The search for causation, knowledge for its own sake, are what we have no trace of before Greece, are what we have learned of her alone. Babylon had a science, but no scientific principle par excellence - the absolute fixity of the laws of Nature. Egypt was acquainted with geometry, but did not create the elements of Euclid. The old Semitic intellect is, by its very nature, anti-philosophic and anti-scientific. In Job the search for causation is represented almost as an impiety. Ecclesiates, science is declared to be vanity. Aristotle, his contemporary nearly, and who might with more reason have said that he had exhausted the universe of knowledge, never for once speaks of his weariness. The wisdom of the Semitic never came from parables and proverbs.
We often hear of an Arabian science and philosophy, and during a century or two in the middle ages the Arabs were really our teachers, but it was only till we had comprehended the Greek originals. This science and this philosophy were but a shabby translation of the science and the philosophy of Greece. At the revival of letters, and on the appearance of authentic Greece, these worthless translations became valueless, and not without reason did all the philologists of the period undertake against them a veritable crusade. Besides, on careful examination, this Arabian science had nothing Arabian about it.
The groundwork is purely Greek, and among those who created it, there is not a pure Semitic; they were Spaniards and Persians, writing in Arabic. The philosophical part that the Jews play in the middle ages is also that of interpreters. Their philosophy is the Arabian, without modification. One page of Roger Bacon contains more veritable scientific insight than the whole of this second-hand science, respectable, surely, as a traditionary link, but utterly void of grand originality."
Of course this is being taught in schools today./s
A NEW TERM FOR OBIE when he starts tweaking on camera
Mussulmanic!!
Thank you
If it’s really dated December 05, 1863,
then there’s nothing “circa” about it.
This smears Jews — as though they were no better than Muslims.
It is literally anti-Semitic — in the most heinous possible manifestation.
bkmk
Also known as Mahometan.
"This smears Jews — as though they were no better than Muslims. It is literally anti-Semitic — in the most heinous possible manifestation."-BenLurkin
The article did raise the hairs on the back of my neck as well. If you choose to follow the link to read the wordy article in its entirety, you'll recognize the above quotes were selected to specifically highlight his views of Muslims and Arabs. The author does separate them at points in his piece, ultimately advocating for the superiority of Christianity (his opinion). The above quotes relay the position of Jews as scribes put to use by the conquering Arab/Muhammedan forces to translate into Arabic material which was plundered from conquered civilizations - material determined worth saving, making claim to it, and obviously not destroyed as jahiliyya.
Muhammedans were generally illiterate. Jews tended to be literate, hence they were not eliminated when useful. Translations obviously were approved by their Muhammedan overlords, which is why the 'knowledge'that was passed on lacked any authenticity.
Jews also were used as 'bankers' because usury (practice of lending money with interest) was against religious laws for Christians as well as Muhammedans...despite money trade being a matter of survival - the practice blackened their identity, helping birth/perpetuate antisemitism.
My point in posting this article from 1863 is to illustrate whether Islam was discussed back then, and to what extent. Political correctness did not exist back then, and I'm curious how the topic was addressed and why.
I am currently exploring several other nineteenth century articles for consideration, because I find that the topic of Islam came up quite a bit more frequently than expected.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.