Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~; 1234; Abundy; Action-America; acoulterfan; AFreeBird; Airwinger; Aliska; altair; ...
Why would a man with two $6000 Swiss made luxury watches choose to wear a $399 Apple Watch instead for 80% of his watch wear? He explains why. PING!
Apple Watch
Ping!
If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me.
2 posted on
08/14/2015 7:20:00 PM PDT by
Swordmaker
( This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
To: Swordmaker
If you own 2 $6000 Swiss watches, why would you want an Apple Watch?
3 posted on
08/14/2015 7:20:17 PM PDT by
tennmountainman
("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small pittance.)
To: Swordmaker
That Christiaan van der Klaauw is incredible. Work of art. Rolex? Meh.
5 posted on
08/14/2015 7:23:08 PM PDT by
montag813
(Bring Back Tar and Feathers)
To: Swordmaker
In 1965 I bought an inexpensive Elgin pocket watch for $35.00. Elgins were no longer made in the US by then. It was Swiss which turned out to be just fine.
I could unscrew the back and adjust it to be faster or slower. The only way I had to check it was when the radio beeped on the hour. After around a month, I got it to where it was only gaining around a second a day. Actually it was a bit better than that, maybe 2/3 second per day.
I noticed it would gain around 2 seconds early in the day, then lose most of it later in the day as it unwound. That watch still works and I have never had it cleaned or any maintenance at all. I hardly ever wear it anymore tho.
Still it was surprisingly accurate for an inexpensive mechanical watch.
7 posted on
08/14/2015 7:25:36 PM PDT by
yarddog
(Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
To: Swordmaker
Does anybody really know what time it is? Does anyone really care?
17 posted on
08/14/2015 7:43:44 PM PDT by
bigbob
(The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
To: Swordmaker
To: Swordmaker
I’ve no idea where my watch is. Haven’t seen it in two years. I don’t care to look for it. There’s now and not now. Everything else is just noise made by someone other than me.
22 posted on
08/14/2015 7:52:55 PM PDT by
davius
(You can roll manure in powdered sugar but that don't make it a jelly doughnut.)
To: Swordmaker
I will take the contrarian Freeper view and say I think it’s a great concept. It frees you from having to constantly retrieve your phone, a benefit which becomes a greater convenience as smart phones get larger. Leave your phone on the desk or on the car seat or in your pocket and use the watch.
It makes the most sense if you are a person who is a heavy user of smart phones, obviously. If you are still using tin cans tethered with string, it’s not for you.
24 posted on
08/14/2015 8:25:32 PM PDT by
Jeff Chandler
(Couples? Same-sex COUPLES?! Don't be such a narrow-minded hate-filled clusterphobe.)
To: Swordmaker
I don’t believe Steve Jobs would have allowed the Apple Watch to be released. It seems an unfinished, unfocused product. I’ve noticed customers avoid it like the plague at the local Apple stores (local being Cupertino, Santa Clara and Palo Alto).
To: Swordmaker
No Patek-Philippe? What a poseur...
:P
26 posted on
08/14/2015 8:48:47 PM PDT by
Kommodor
(Terrorist, Journalist or Democrat? I can't tell the difference.)
To: Swordmaker
My $6.94 watch from Wall-mart keeps perfect time and in 3 years when the battery starts going bad I can buy a new one for less than replacing the battery, it does everything need a watch for.
30 posted on
08/14/2015 9:12:01 PM PDT by
dalereed
To: Swordmaker
Just saw a ad for the Apple WATCH on the SF Giants
32 posted on
08/14/2015 9:24:10 PM PDT by
tubebender
(Evening news is where they begin with "Good Evening," and then proceed to tell you why it isn't.)
To: Swordmaker
Try to buy back your soul. Regardless, of any watches or redeemable units of integrity. Whadda ya think? Give it a try. That’s all you got, right?
To: Swordmaker
Why would anyone buy an Apple watch in the first place?
35 posted on
08/14/2015 9:40:41 PM PDT by
mkleesma
(`Call to me, and I will answer you and tell you great and unsearchable things you do not know.')
To: Swordmaker
I started to plunk down a big chunk of change for a nice watch...
And then decided a nice looking $200 dept. store watch was all I needed....
Oh....and a $40 sport watch.
36 posted on
08/14/2015 9:47:46 PM PDT by
G Larry
(Obama is replicating the instruments of the fall of Rome)
To: Swordmaker
$6000 watch?
Good grief.
Got mine at Walmart for $12.50. Keeps accurate time. Has both the date and the day of the week.
$6000 watch. Ridiculous.
42 posted on
08/14/2015 10:26:37 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: Swordmaker
Why did you buy it in the first place? To brag about your fancy Swiss watches? I have a Timex. Can I brag about that?
To: Swordmaker
You own swiss watch for its craftsmanship dependability and exclusivity.
Tard...
48 posted on
08/14/2015 11:20:31 PM PDT by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
To: Swordmaker
Come 2017, Hillary will be in either the big house or the White House. If the latter, then these might come back in style:
61 posted on
08/15/2015 12:56:34 AM PDT by
kevao
(Biblical Jesus: Give your money to the poor. Socialist Jesus: Give your neighbor's money to the poor)
To: Swordmaker
If I had unlimited amounts of money, I sure wouldn’t spend it on either a $6,000 Swiss watch or a $400 Apple watch. My $100 Seiko tells the time just fine and I don’t want to carry a magnifying glass to read stuff on an Apple watch.
74 posted on
08/15/2015 6:40:35 AM PDT by
The Great RJ
(“Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money.” Margaret Thatcher)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson