If one has done something that has been perfectly legal and acceptable for decades, why does he have to explain and prove anything?
The above article, if read in its entirety, explains everything in detail.......Any alleged accountability is the responsibility of the outfitter he contracted with.
The above article, if read in its entirety, explains everything in detail.......Any alleged accountability is the responsibility of the outfitter he contracted with.
He doesn't have to do anything. (See post 26.)
Maybe if he explained his reliance upon the outfitter it might help. It certainly can't hurt for him to confront the issues. I think it's the hiding that's hurting him more than anything else right now. Right now, people are talking about him as if he's not even human. They won't be able to do that if he comes out of the bunker.
What do you think he should do? Do you like his current strategy?