Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Crim

Yes, a—clowns have rights, but NONE of hers were violated.

The officer had the right to order her out of the car at any time. (Pennsylvania vs. Mimms) Whether it was her obnoxious response to his request to put out the cigarette or something else is totally irrelevant. It was a lawful order, she defied it, giving him the right to use physical force.

She physically resisted, giving him the right to threaten to use the tazer. If she had not complied at that point he could have legally tazed her.

You can quibble about whether he was deferential enough to the lunatic, but he committed no crime or rights violation.


45 posted on 07/26/2015 10:51:35 PM PDT by Above My Pay Grade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: Above My Pay Grade; Crim
You can quibble about whether he was deferential enough to the lunatic, but he committed no crime or rights violation.

He broke the on-campus speed limit, in order to "position himself" for pulling over lil Miss Brown Sugar for a chat-up...

192 posted on 07/29/2015 4:50:47 PM PDT by kiryandil (Egging the battleship USS Sarah Palin from their little Progressive rowboats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: Above My Pay Grade; Crim
You can quibble about whether he was deferential enough to the lunatic, but he committed no crime or rights violation.

He broke the on-campus speed limit, in order to "position himself" for pulling over lil Miss Brown Sugar for a chat-up...

193 posted on 07/29/2015 4:50:47 PM PDT by kiryandil (Egging the battleship USS Sarah Palin from their little Progressive rowboats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson