Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Mrs. Don-o

“[Pregnancy] does not require medical treatment.”

That may or may not be true, but most pregnant women nowadays get regular medical care and I don’t think anyone would encourage a pregnant woman NOT to see a doctor.

I’m opposed to abortion and I would urge this woman not to have one but the fact of the matter is that if she did not have an abortion she would still need regular checkups during her pregnancy.

I’m sure this woman will prevail in her suit and if she does not she’s almost certain to prevail in the violation of her civil rights suit that she will file later.


10 posted on 07/22/2015 4:09:48 PM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: jocon307
Regular check-ups would certainly be a good thing, and they could, I presume, be provided by the staff at the County institution.

The legal and political system are so corrupt I'm sure any sort of pro-abortion lawsuit would prevail. Nevertheless, it would not be because genuine concern for her real welfare or her real right; it is only because of the decayed state of law and justice.

11 posted on 07/22/2015 7:07:30 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (The fundamental things apply, as time goes by.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson