It’s time to ban Christianity...
So it beings.
“yet many of the same people who pressed for marriage equality for gay couples oppose it.”
Because they are flaming $@%%^%^#@# hypocrites, genius!
Do we really have to be the only sane people in this nation?
Based upon the majority Supreme Courts reasoning there is no logical objection to Polygamy.
When Traditionalists pointed out the logic of SSM leads directly to polygamy, they were laughed at and called wackos. Looks who is right now. Perhaps as this article mentions the whole SSM does not lead to polygamy was an outright lie on the pro-SSM side. They wanted to first make sure SSM is legal now onto polygamy. Viva La Revolucion!
Polygamy is overdue. Love should be a personal choice.
Liberals call southerners “inbred rednecks”. Yet, liberals support sodomy and polygamy. Go figure.
That was fast.
The slope has vanished, just a deep dark hole is all that is under us now... we fell in
The Bachelorettes. Coming to ABC this Fall.
Polygamy will be the law of the land in five years or less and child marriage and all forms of plural marriage will be forced on us in ten years or less all by unelected judges. The seeds of another American Revolution have been sown.
My neighbor can finally marry his cat.
Anti-polygamy laws violate Muslim rights so they have to go. CARE and Obama will see to it. Christians’ religious freedom can be violated but not theirs.
Notice that sodomites don’t force halal bakeries to bake their wedding cakes or force Muslim photographers to take their pictures. Obama would unleash the full power of the regime on a gay couple who did that.
Why not? Cat’s out of the bag.
Why stop with polygamy? Why not allow all forms of plural marriage and arranged child marriage too not to mention legalizing incest. All the same arguments for gay marriage apply.
It’s Time to Legalize Polygamy and marry your dog and cat and donkey too.... Hollywood is gonna love this. It makes them look normal.
The slippery slope started long ago when marriage was effectively redefined from a sacred covenant relationship centered on the nuclear family to a branch of contract law. Cohabitation, divorce, unwed motherhood were once scandalous conditions that carried significant social stigma with them. Today’s ruling is merely a natural progression of the ongoing redefinition of marriage that has been in progress for the past 50+ years. To believe that this won’t continue is naive in the extreme.
Now that it has been decided that “marriage” is whatever we choose to say it is and is purely a contract with no larger significance, things can accelerate. Polygamy and plural marriages of whatever number and mix of sexes is the next logical step and will arrive with stunning swiftness. I fully expect the first court cases extending the new definition of marriage to plural arrangements to be decided by next year.
Beyond this, incest is the next step. Just consider the tax advantages of being able to “marry” one’s elderly parent(s) and enjoy full spousal inheritance rights with no estate taxes to worry about. The government may fume, but there’s simply no legal basis for opposing this because we all know that it’s all about #lovewins.