Yes, and if you try to "understand" it, "You will go down the drain into a blind alley, from which no one has ever escaped."
I maintain that the language of weirdness is all predicated on an attempt to retain a classical concept of objects. The correct view is that objects are emergent constructs of multiple quantum events. I don't see why people can't just accept this, as Feynman advocated.
I maintain that the language of weirdness is all predicated on an attempt to retain a classical concept of objects. The correct view is that objects are emergent constructs of multiple quantum events. I don’t see why people can’t just accept this, as Feynman advocated.
++++
That could be. But accepting it is one thing and understanding it is quite another. But then again, even as a child, we all learned that rocks fall down not up. Now that makes sense to us despite the fact that we really don’t understand gravity much better than we do quarks.