Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Mrs. Don-o
Oh, but some of the gheyghs WILL be bringing children into the... mix.

Well, sure! My main thought was about procreation, not alternative use, if you will.

The fact that 'gheyghs' have to resort to these extraordinary means testifies to the inherent futility of their 'natural' place in the scheme of God's intentions.

The underlying tenet of the whole thing is that they cannot reproduce without the help of a female of the species of some kind involved. And that is what makes their lifestyle's justification invalid.

31 posted on 05/20/2015 9:24:30 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Gaffer
Well, it's true they've chosen to violate sexual unity radically in two ways: first, by choosing to separate sex from procreation, then choosing to separate procreation from sex. Both are radically wrong because both deform the nature of sex as a fusion of union and fertility.

Gay sex (oral/anal)is essentially a kind of artificial sex. A parody of sex. A sad and disappointing one, too. Even if it's done by heterosexuals.

32 posted on 05/20/2015 10:23:34 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("They say what's up is down, they say what isn't, is, they put ideas in his head he thought were his)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson