Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Walter Scott was driving his passenger home for a cookout...shot dead by South Carolina cop
Associated Press and Dailymail.com ^ | 16 April 2015 | Associated Press and Dailymail.com Reporter

Posted on 04/17/2015 1:40:52 PM PDT by familyop

Walter Scott and his passenger were looking forward to having a cookout when he was pulled over and shot dead by a South Carolina police officer, it has emerged. Scott, 50, and Pierre Fulton, his friend of several years, had met for breakfast on April 4 before Scott drove him to a church...Scott was behind $18,000 in his child support payments and family members have said he may have run because he was worried about going to jail.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: copbashersonfr; copbashingonfr; corruption; crime; handsupdontshoot; immunity; murder; southcarolina
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-135 next last
To: kiryandil

Okay, thank you for your fascinating analysis, kiryandil.


101 posted on 04/17/2015 10:24:58 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: sport
What amazes me is that the boot-lickers just CAN'T admit that Slager brought it on himself by pursuing and picking a fight with the recalcitrant peasant.

Walter Scott wanted to leave the area, and showed over and over and over that that's ALL he wanted to do.

But he was guilty of Michael Slager's Capital Crime of "Contempt of Cop", and therefore had to die...

102 posted on 04/17/2015 10:34:06 PM PDT by kiryandil (Egging the battleship USS Sarah Palin from their little Progressive rowboats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

I noticed. But worship of authority, a/k/a, jackboot licking, runs deep in some.


103 posted on 04/17/2015 10:44:17 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick

I don’t see any such checks to abuse of power in the model of policing that you propose. Are we subjects now, to what is essentially rule by whatever violence the government should choose to mete out?

If you were the subject of an abuse of power by an officer of the law or other agent of the government, what checks to such abuse would you want and/or expect to be in place to deter those abuses, protect you from them, and/or compensate you for damage done by them?

This question is not only generally relevant to the topic, but also specifically relevant to the jurisdiction, which has a reputation for excessive taser use, and this specific officer as well.


104 posted on 04/18/2015 12:35:23 AM PDT by Digital Handyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Neidermeyer

You hit the nail on the head. The central problem is the network of infractions with excessive penalties that is designed to escalate to the use of force.

Problem 1 is that a person is being pulled over for a broken tail light. It was daytime. Doesn’t that officer have something better to do with his time? No, he doesn’t, because he’s got a revenue quota and this is one of the ways of meeting it. If not for the fact of a broken tail light, Walter Scott would still be alive. This is a mind-blowingly perverse situation.

Problem 2 is that a man can go to jail for not being able to pay court-ordered child support. I could not imagine a less constructive policy; a man in jail is not able to work to pay down the sum, and giving him a criminal record makes it substantially more difficult to do that as well. At this point in history we are supposed to understand that debtors’ prisons are barbaric and not useful.

Problem 3 is that it’s not obvious to all that a man scared to be arrested for not paying child support when he simply doesn’t have the capacity to pay shouldn’t be gunned down if he runs away from a taser. Willingly standing still to be tasered is not a normal human reaction so that can’t reasonably be expected of the victim.

He sure ain’t paying down that child support or fixing that tail light now, which is empirical evidence that present predominant paramilitary policing practices as applied under an already-large and ever-increasing body of criminal law is taking bad situations and making them worse, rather than leading to better outcomes.


105 posted on 04/18/2015 12:35:23 AM PDT by Digital Handyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: biggredd1
Scott fled from police officer 3 times, assaulted police officer 2 times, shot police officer with taser one time.

That settles it - we have been inundated with leftists who haven't yet discovered they are leftists. The ability to make up "facts" out of thin air because they fit their meme, and then espouse the lies as actual facts is the first clue.

106 posted on 04/18/2015 3:26:19 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Digital Handyman

I’m not sure that I’ve proposed a model of policing. If anything, prior to 1985 there was actually less of a check on police power in this sort of situation. The common law that went back to our founding and even earlier held that police could kill any fleeing felon. (OTOH, there were fewer offenses that were considered felonies, but assaulting a police officer and taking his weapon surely would have been one of them.)

Policing is inherently a slippery slope with limits that are difficult to formalize. The quality of policing is fundamentally a function of culture rather than of formal limits. A healthy culture can place few such limits on its police yet still have civilized policing that respects the citizenry.


107 posted on 04/18/2015 5:44:15 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Digital Handyman
Problem 1 is that a person is being pulled over for a broken tail light. It was daytime. Doesn’t that officer have something better to do with his time? No, he doesn’t, because he’s got a revenue quota and this is one of the ways of meeting it. If not for the fact of a broken tail light, Walter Scott would still be alive. This is a mind-blowingly perverse situation.

His family said that Walter Scott used roads and streets that were less frequented by the agents of the State.

We refer to this as "using the Outlaw Trail", where I live.

The notion that there's pretty much a cop under every rock these days should give a thinking peasant pause...

Scott couldn't avoid the murderous revenooers, no matter what he did.

108 posted on 04/18/2015 5:52:36 AM PDT by kiryandil (Egging the battleship USS Sarah Palin from their little Progressive rowboats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick; Digital Handyman
If anything, prior to 1985 there was actually less of a check on police power in this sort of situation.

I would submit that prior to 1985, there wasn't a cop under every rock, so it was less of an issue. Plus, police weren't trained to "confront at all costs", as they are today.

We're inundated with "law enforcement" people of every stripe these days.

They sure drive fancy rigs, too - wish I could maintain my vehicles and property like that. I guess when money is no object (you just seize it from malefactors like Robert Durst), you can operate like that...

109 posted on 04/18/2015 5:58:46 AM PDT by kiryandil (Egging the battleship USS Sarah Palin from their little Progressive rowboats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Digital Handyman
"Policing For Profit":

Murder suspect Robert Durst wants police to give back the $161,000 'life on the run' money seized during arrest
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3042789/Durst-wants-money-police-161K.html

Geez! They stole it at gunpoint, fair & square! What a whiner!

Besides, Durst might have Done Bad Stuff, so the stealing is All Good.

Wonder if that's why Slager pulled over Walter Scott's Mercedes? Because he thought he might rack in some revenue or a car for the local "Policing For Profit" drive?

110 posted on 04/18/2015 7:30:38 AM PDT by kiryandil (Egging the battleship USS Sarah Palin from their little Progressive rowboats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

You got your facts confused. Mike Brown is dead. And Walt was the one resisting arrest and attacking the LEO.


111 posted on 04/18/2015 9:27:41 AM PDT by TheDon (BO must be replaced immediately for the good of the nation and the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: TheDon
You got your facts confused. Mike Brown is dead. And Walt was the one resisting arrest and attacking the LEO.

You got your facts confused. Mike Slager is going to prison, where he'll wish he was dead. And Walt was the one running away from and attacked by the LEO Slager.

Officer Mikey Slager just couldn't let it go, but he got filmed, unfortunately for him...

112 posted on 04/18/2015 10:44:09 AM PDT by kiryandil (Egging the battleship USS Sarah Palin from their little Progressive rowboats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick

The American legal tradition stems from a root that is all about putting limits on what the agents of government may do. From the Magna Carta onwards, the major developments in Western legal tradition are all about guaranteeing freedom from violent and arbitrary impositions of government.

The strict limits put on government power in the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the explicit text of the Declaration of Independence all speak directly to that tradition. The enormous benefits of the innovations in human liberty such as freedom of conscience, the right to a trial of one’s peers, the right to be secure in one’s property, and others all exist for this purpose.

I will have to disagree with the assertion that a civilized society can co-exist with one that has limited checks on police power - the two don’t go together, and the idea that they do runs directly counter to these central legal concepts of Western civilization. Unchecked power is always abused; surely the Obama administration is evidence enough that the argument to limit the power of the government over citizens.


113 posted on 04/18/2015 10:48:02 AM PDT by Digital Handyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Digital Handyman
The strict limits put on government power in the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the explicit text of the Declaration of Independence all speak directly to that tradition.

I'm just confused about how the Founders managed to get along without police crawling around everywhere, like maggots on a gut wagon...

114 posted on 04/18/2015 11:16:07 AM PDT by kiryandil (Egging the battleship USS Sarah Palin from their little Progressive rowboats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

We shall see. The facts may prove otherwise.


115 posted on 04/18/2015 12:18:12 PM PDT by TheDon (BO must be replaced immediately for the good of the nation and the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Digital Handyman

I appreciate where you’re coming from but your argument is just too abstract. As far as the letter of the law, the police are probably more limited than ever. This is certainly true in this particular case where prior to 1985 a cop could shoot any fleeing felon.

A lot of police work happens at the gut level. You can pile on the formal limits but ultimately it’s cultural conditioning that shapes how a policeman relates to the public he serves.


116 posted on 04/18/2015 2:22:03 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: TheDon
We shall see. The facts may prove otherwise

Not sure the "tidying up" of the crime scene is going to go over big with the peasants on the jury. Plus the back-shooting.

That's still a big No-NO in this country.

Like George Zimmerman, Michael Slager should have stayed in his squad car, with Walter Scott's license in hand. And his Mercedes. And his passenger.

Perhaps this incident will enlighten a few over-zealous officers of the law...

Well, at least make sure that they rough up the kid who's videoing them, and grab the cell phone...

117 posted on 04/18/2015 2:53:20 PM PDT by kiryandil (Egging the battleship USS Sarah Palin from their little Progressive rowboats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick; Digital Handyman
This is certainly true in this particular case where prior to 1985 a cop could shoot any fleeing felon.

Is this written down anywhere, or are you just promoting your gut-level sense of a "rule of thumb" from before the onset of the Golden Age of The Police State?

We'll also have to note that Walter Scott was NOT a felon.

And just because Slager assaulted Scott in the back alley doesn't make Scott a felon.

It's more like it makes Slager a vigilante.

118 posted on 04/18/2015 2:57:13 PM PDT by kiryandil (Egging the battleship USS Sarah Palin from their little Progressive rowboats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Trayvon lived like a thug and died like a thug. Better parenting and he might still be above ground.

It will be interesting to hear what reason the LEO gives for drawing his firearm in this case.


119 posted on 04/18/2015 3:12:11 PM PDT by TheDon (BO must be replaced immediately for the good of the nation and the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

You might try googling “fleeing felon rule”.

When you assault a police officer and grab his weapon, you have committed a felony.


120 posted on 04/18/2015 3:12:37 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson