“it is actually based on his own one statement.”
That was a lie? Outside of calling everyone “Apple haters”, that was the only actual statement he made on the story, and that was for his little Ping list. And that one statement was wesley-worded, and had no logic as I pointed out.
“In the best liberal tradition, you took what was said, distort, interpret, and rewrite/redefine, then attribute all of your mendacity to the original.”
He wrote it. If you don’t like what he said, take it up with him.
Yup. You seem to think your "...one statement was wesley-worded, and had no logic as I pointed out" statement carries the authority of Holy Writ.
It does not.
That you don't seem to understand that "distinction without difference" is no difference speaks to the woeful slide in intellectual literacy FR has suffered in the past several years.
Another LIE from out of your mouth, VanDeKoik. I have never called "everyone Apple Haters". I have called YOU and a few other very obvious members of the Apple Hate mongering brigade Apple Haters. . . but never "everyone" because they are not. YOU are the one who conflates the specific into the general, making every Apple user into homosexual perverts and stupid "''tards" for deigning to choose a different computer or phone than you do.
He wrote it. If you don’t like what he said, take it up with him.
And exactly what was so heinous about what I wrote in a short blurb in a PING message giving a short description of the contents to invite the members of the list to the thread. It wasn't a treatise. What part of the word "reprehensible" do you fail to comprehend??? Here, asshat, let me help you with your education:
DICTIONARY:
reprehensible |ˌrepriˈhensəbəl| — adjective
deserving censure or condemnation: His complacency and reprehensible laxity.THESAURUS:
reprehensible — adjective
His conduct was reprehensible: deplorable, disgraceful, discreditable, despicable, blameworthy, culpable, wrong, bad, shameful, dishonorable, objectionable, opprobrious, repugnant, inexcusable, unforgivable, indefensible, unjustifiable; criminal, sinful, scandalous, iniquitous.
My use of that word was quite appropriate. . . and explicit. It carries an exact meaning. "IT DOES NOT MEAN "I SUPPORT TIM COOK'S GAY AGENDA AND ATTACKS ON RELIGION!", which is what you have been telling everyone I have been saying! YOU LYING ASSHAT IDIOT!