Posted on 03/28/2015 12:55:15 AM PDT by jonrick46
It's very possible that her choices saved her life. If she'd been home that night, who's to say she wouldn't also have been killed?
... I hadn’t thought of that.
You forgot to add that we’re ridiculously good looking and very witty!
Your an ass.
You're an ass.
If you must resort to juvenile insults you should try to avoid coming across as a barely literate half-wit.
Yes, as I said, Knox is an idiotic liberal, slutty, pot whore, but that does not make her a murderer.
Your opinion of her would devastate her but fortunately she doesn’t know you exist.
The support for this woman here is really strange. There’s a clear bias here. She could do anything - lie repeatedly, accuse an innocent man, change her alibi - and her FReeper fan club would come up with some excuse for her: “Oh, she was just confused.” “Just a scared girl.”
Her DNA was found mixed with the victim’s, and in connection with the staged break-in, and there was other evidence... but her fan club here does not care. They’ll explain away everything: “Oh, she slid on the bloody bathmat.” “She pierced her ears the night before.” WTH?
They’re also misinformed about Guede. He was convicted of being ONE of the attackers - not of being the only attacker. And his DNA was not found in the small bathroom where all the blood was. Knox’s DNA was found mixed with the victim’s in there. But her FReeper fan club doesn’t want to hear it.
Also, they keep talking about Guede’s brushes with the law, but not a word about Knox’s wild past or brush with the law or that she once staged a break-in as a prank or that she exhibited nymphomaniac behaviors.
And notice, not one word here on this thread about the only REAL victim - Meredith Kercher. Her family is being denied justice now.
I want to know what Ann Coulter has to say about this case now. She was pretty clear on where she stood in 2011 and 2013:
http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2011-09-07.html
http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2013-04-03.html
Thank you! I’m glad I’m not the only one being fooled by this psychopath. I really think so many people think she is innocent because of her looks, I really do. It’s some sort of strange phenomenon when it comes to our society, people will buy into anything if a person is good looking no matter how much evidence shows them as evil. It’s how a rapist and serial sexual offender named Bill Clinton got elected twice and how an America hating radical Islamic agent named Barak Obama got elected twice. I really don’t know why that happens, I guess some people find it impossible to connect good looks and evil, maybe it’s something with the way the human mind is built.
How about the one store owner who said she was waiting outside his store waiting for him to open so she could buy bleach and cleaning supplies? How do people explain something like that away? Do they honestly think she is a clean freak? She just loves to play housekeeper and can’t WAIT to start cleaning? And that is just ONE piece of evidence, it just goes on and on and on and on and on with this girl and people STILL think she is innocent! It just blows my mind, it really does. If Knox were black and ugly, these same people would be screaming guilty at the top of their lungs, it’s fascinating to me how much looks play a huge part in someones decision making when it comes to crime, it’s really scary because you get people like Ted Bundy who end up killing for years pretty much scot free because people refuse to make the connection “Oh he’s too good looking to be a killer”. Same with Jeffrey Dahmer the cannibal, another good looking guy who was actually allowed BY the police to continue torturing a teen boy!! The kid escaped from Dahmers apartment, ran screaming and naked into the street, the cops came and Dahmer told them he and the boy were gay lovers and incredibly the cops let him go WITH the kid who he ended up killing.
LOL!!!
I agree. That is apparently what she meant when she said "I'm the lucky one" to the press after her exoneration. Most of the Brits in the DailyMail comments columns, after having been whipped into a frenzy of hatred by DM over the past 7-8 years, thought she had no right even to smile.
You're an ass.
Get a room, you two.
Someone has to help the barely literate.
It is scary. It seems as if people have preconceived notions of what "innocent" looks like. To some people, "innocent" looks like a young black male, and "evil" looks like a man in a police uniform. To other people, "innocent" looks like a young white woman.
When the story first broke, though, I don't remember people questioning her guilt. The press published photos of her laughing and so on, and the rumor was that there was some kind of satanic ritual involved (although, it turns out, the prosecutor never really said that), and her looks didn't help her back then.
But later, it seems, as her hair grew longer and the press kept snapping her photo, people started to give her another look. The later photos make her look like an innocent kid, like a deer caught in the headlights. Then the stories about the prosecutor only helped to bolster her image. (I bought it all, too, until I started reading more about the case.)
Maybe she really is innocent, but then there has to be some kind of crazy explanation for all the evidence, including her DNA and her fingerprint; her behavior, including her false accusation and various alibis; and everything else. Maybe she didn't commit murder but helped to cover up for the two guys... that's the only other explanation that seems plausible.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.