Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: jonatron

Although she may not have reasoned it out clearly, it appears that she intuited that ***king is a poor substitute for comprehensive, life-giving love. Unfortunately, she (like many others) seems to have imagined that the solution to her emptiness was more varied ***king, rather than something categorically different.


21 posted on 03/22/2015 3:24:39 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Google "tiny kitten pictures," and put down the gun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tax-chick

Bingo!


34 posted on 03/22/2015 3:35:42 PM PDT by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Tax-chick

I can’t get over the fact that she just wouldn’t stand for JUST FOUR LOVERS!! Shriek!

I mean....four.....what was the problem? If she’d never had any but the one, what’s the problem and what’s that got to do with no children? It just seems like a strange statement.


84 posted on 03/23/2015 5:17:26 AM PDT by Shimmer1 (Liberty does not exist in the absence of morality. Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson