[Swordmaker]

Gay? Of course you'd claim that. . . but there are Apple Watches for both women and men:

Do you think this version of the Apple Watch in stainless steel looks "Gay"?

I don't think it looks "gay", not at all.

[VanDeKoik]

500 dollars for something that looks slightly less like a toy, still needs to be charged after 18 hours, and practically useless for much more than getting texts and sending doodles to other Apple watches?

Still about as gay as it gets.

Have fun navigating a tiny screen full of gumballs. The only thing missing is a complementary “sucker” sign to go on the back of whomever shells out money for yet another thing the feds can track you with.

[Mark17]

I don't think it looks "gay", not at all.

I think it looks fine, but my question is, besides looking nice, and being something I would wear on my wrist, will it do more than my iPhone already does? It appears to me, to be just an extension of my IPhone.