Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv
Cool how archeology never proves the Bible wrong.
Spent a day at Tel Dan excavations where the first tablet confirming the existance of King David was found - up 'til then secularists considered him a legend, like King Arthur.
3 posted on 03/04/2015 4:57:45 AM PST by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Psalm 73

Archaeologists as well as dunces and charlatans have searched all over for the remains of Noah’s Ark, or the ruins of Sodom and Gomorrah, or the lost army of the Pharaoh of the Exodus, and have found either nothing, or tried to pull off hoax after hoax.

Archaeology has turned up almost nothing at all from the Bible, but the Bible has been tapped for names of things and in the process undermined the facts on the ground on the historical annals aspect of the texts, and as a consequence undermined the believability of the whole work.

The name of an otherwise unremarkable and unattested group, the Hittites, was pulled out of the OT and assigned to some then-new discoveries in Anatolia. There’s nothing much about the Hittites in the OT, and the Anatolian group was a major power, but left no trace at all in the OT.

The identification of Ramesses II “the Great” was saddled on as “proof” of the Exodus, when in fact it is just the opposite, thanks to a corrupted timeline for Egyptian history. Insist that the existence of Ramesses II corroborates the existence of Moses or the story of the Exodus, and look like an utter dolt for free.


4 posted on 03/04/2015 6:13:55 AM PST by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson