[Doogle]

FIGURES

[baltimorepoet]

The fact that even 4 people voted they way they did, indicates that you can’t fix stupid.

[mc5cents]

Now Kagan is hitting the sauce too? What is going on at the SC?

[Tenacious 1]

It’s snowing here.

[PROCON]

A prime example Affirmative Action at its worst.

[Paladin2]

Kagan is clearly no genius. She’s known as a rat hack. Just another example.

[Kenny Bunk]

Give Kaganovich's grandniece, and the sister of the head of the CPUSA credit for this one.

Next week she will undoubtedly vote for the exile to Siberia or the massacre by starvation of America's independent farmers, just like her famous relative.

Red Diaper Kagan's Famous Relative

[longfellowsmuse]

I am not a fisherman, but I thought that when you catch a fish that is too small, that you are supposed to throw them back...

She was trying to be witty I’m sure but I’m not really sure how the Suess quote pertains to the point she was making.... other than the fact that she has the ability to quote first grade reading material.

[vetvetdoug]

I thought Kagan’s expertise was in Sharia Law?

[GeronL]

shouldn’t they be citing the Constitution and stuff, or am I just too old-fashion??

[left that other site]

I submit that the Dr. Seuss argument should be applied to repeal Roe vs Wade.

“A person is a person, no matter how small.”

from “Horton hears a Whoo”

[originalbuckeye]

Just when I think Leftists couldn’t embarrass me more, they quickly outdo themselves.

[Buckeye McFrog]

...and citing the precedent from the case of North Going Zax v. South Going Zax.....

[centurion316]

Making me eat Green Eggs and Ham is a clear violation of my Constitutional rights and I don’t care what Justice Kagan thinks.

[a fool in paradise]

The Leftards who mocked Ted Cruz for reciting Seuss in his filibuster will now tell us how wise she was.

[Ann Archy]

Children....everyone in leadership roles are CHILDREN!

[RinaseaofDs]

Another excellent product of Harvard. The Ivy League is going to end up killing us all.

[Impy]

I don’t know where the court’s decision was legally correct or not, but the prosecution of the fisherman was ridiculous.

[mlo]

Oh stop. Might as well criticize her for breathing. She “cited” Dr. Suess to the undisputed point that a fish is a real object. It’s called a joke.

When we criticize people for every little thing it just dilutes meaningful criticism.

[SeaHawkFan]

First of all, SOX should not apply to a situation like this; it’s absurd.

Second, it should be a civil matter, not a criminal one.

This is a case where Thomas and Scalia got off track from their usual contextual interpretation of the law.

As an aside, “Alice in Wonderland” has been cited in more that a couple of USSC decisions. Such a citation would have been appropriate in this decision.