Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Big Bang? Quantum equation predicts universe has no beginning
Phys.Org ^ | 02/09/2015 | by Lisa Zyga

Posted on 02/09/2015 10:55:17 AM PST by Red Badger

(Phys.org) —The universe may have existed forever, according to a new model that applies quantum correction terms to complement Einstein's theory of general relativity. The model may also account for dark matter and dark energy, resolving multiple problems at once.

The widely accepted age of the universe, as estimated by general relativity, is 13.8 billion years. In the beginning, everything in existence is thought to have occupied a single infinitely dense point, or singularity. Only after this point began to expand in a "Big Bang" did the universe officially begin.

Although the Big Bang singularity arises directly and unavoidably from the mathematics of general relativity, some scientists see it as problematic because the math can explain only what happened immediately after—not at or before—the singularity.

"The Big Bang singularity is the most serious problem of general relativity because the laws of physics appear to break down there," Ahmed Farag Ali at Benha University and the Zewail City of Science and Technology, both in Egypt, told Phys.org.

Ali and coauthor Saurya Das at the University of Lethbridge in Alberta, Canada, have shown in a paper published in Physics Letters B that the Big Bang singularity can be resolved by their new model in which the universe has no beginning and no end.

Old ideas revisited

The physicists emphasize that their quantum correction terms are not applied ad hoc in an attempt to specifically eliminate the Big Bang singularity. Their work is based on ideas by the theoretical physicist David Bohm, who is also known for his contributions to the philosophy of physics. Starting in the 1950s, Bohm explored replacing classical geodesics (the shortest path between two points on a curved surface) with quantum trajectories.

In their paper, Ali and Das applied these Bohmian trajectories to an equation developed in the 1950s by physicist Amal Kumar Raychaudhuri at Presidency University in Kolkata, India. Raychaudhuri was also Das's teacher when he was an undergraduate student of that institution in the '90s.

Using the quantum-corrected Raychaudhuri equation, Ali and Das derived quantum-corrected Friedmann equations, which describe the expansion and evolution of universe (including the Big Bang) within the context of general relativity. Although it's not a true theory of quantum gravity, the model does contain elements from both quantum theory and general relativity. Ali and Das also expect their results to hold even if and when a full theory of quantum gravity is formulated.

No singularities nor dark stuff

In addition to not predicting a Big Bang singularity, the new model does not predict a "big crunch" singularity, either. In general relativity, one possible fate of the universe is that it starts to shrink until it collapses in on itself in a big crunch and becomes an infinitely dense point once again.

Ali and Das explain in their paper that their model avoids singularities because of a key difference between classical geodesics and Bohmian trajectories. Classical geodesics eventually cross each other, and the points at which they converge are singularities. In contrast, Bohmian trajectories never cross each other, so singularities do not appear in the equations.

In cosmological terms, the scientists explain that the quantum corrections can be thought of as a cosmological constant term (without the need for dark energy) and a radiation term. These terms keep the universe at a finite size, and therefore give it an infinite age. The terms also make predictions that agree closely with current observations of the cosmological constant and density of the universe.

New gravity particle

In physical terms, the model describes the universe as being filled with a quantum fluid. The scientists propose that this fluid might be composed of gravitons—hypothetical massless particles that mediate the force of gravity. If they exist, gravitons are thought to play a key role in a theory of quantum gravity.

In a related paper, Das and another collaborator, Rajat Bhaduri of McMaster University, Canada, have lent further credence to this model. They show that gravitons can form a Bose-Einstein condensate (named after Einstein and another Indian physicist, Satyendranath Bose) at temperatures that were present in the universe at all epochs.

Motivated by the model's potential to resolve the Big Bang singularity and account for dark matter and dark energy, the physicists plan to analyze their model more rigorously in the future. Their future work includes redoing their study while taking into account small inhomogeneous and anisotropic perturbations, but they do not expect small perturbations to significantly affect the results.

"It is satisfying to note that such straightforward corrections can potentially resolve so many issues at once," Das said.

Explore further: Did the universe originate from a hyper-dimensional black hole?

More information: Ahmed Farag Ali and Saurya Das. "Cosmology from quantum potential." Physics Letters B. Volume 741, 4 February 2015, Pages 276–279. DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2014.12.057. Also at: arXiv:1404.3093[gr-qc].

Saurya Das and Rajat K. Bhaduri, "Dark matter and dark energy from Bose-Einstein condensate", preprint: arXiv:1411.0753[gr-qc].

Journal reference: Physics Letters B


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: bigbang; quantum; relativity; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last
To: Steve_Seattle

Into what space is the Big Bang expanding?

Another universe...................

61 posted on 02/09/2015 1:09:02 PM PST by Red Badger (If you compromise with evil, you just get more evil..........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Programming provides immediate positive feedback for accurate input. That’s very important for OCD persons. The potential (even it not yet realized) to create the universe you want is valuable, too!


62 posted on 02/09/2015 1:10:02 PM PST by Tax-chick ("Where's Dark Betrayal when you really need it?!?" ~James)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73

And the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
Amen!


63 posted on 02/09/2015 1:22:35 PM PST by vpintheak (Call them what they are - regressive control-freaks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

QUANTUM...............


64 posted on 02/09/2015 1:27:33 PM PST by Red Badger (If you compromise with evil, you just get more evil..........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
The universe may have existed forever

Ayn Rand believed that the law of causality does not apply to all entities. Some entities do not have a cause and thus do not come into being or pass away, but are eternal, such as the universe as a whole.

65 posted on 02/09/2015 1:46:39 PM PST by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: left that other site

What’s a penguin doing on the telly?


66 posted on 02/09/2015 1:48:11 PM PST by zeugma (The act of observing disturbs the observed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
according to a new model

Because new models are so popular in 'climate science'.

This new view of the universe is brought to by the "Anything but God" school of cosmology.

67 posted on 02/09/2015 1:55:33 PM PST by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle
God had no beginning and has no end - He is forever and we just don’t get it.

The eternal God created time! It is that simple. We live and die (as you said) in time. The mind of man cannot comprehend what God created. He said "Let there be light." The big Bang? Then He separated the night from the day. Time? People should look deeper into the scripture.

Dinesh D'Souza's book "What's So Great About Christianity" has what I believe a very good explanation of the creation story told in the Bible.

68 posted on 02/09/2015 1:56:13 PM PST by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Very interesting.

Thanks for posting.


69 posted on 02/09/2015 2:02:06 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle
"We are born, live and die and our understanding of space & time is based on those certainties (a beginning, a middle and an end).

God had no beginning and has no end - He is forever and we just don’t get it."

Who is we? I know you would not be presumptuous enough to speak for all mankind, would you?

70 posted on 02/09/2015 2:03:31 PM PST by philoginist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: mjp

Ayn Rand was an atheist. It was her greatest failing in my view. She had some good thoughts but could not come to grips with an eternal God. Too bad.


71 posted on 02/09/2015 2:04:20 PM PST by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

There’s nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.


72 posted on 02/09/2015 2:04:55 PM PST by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
When G-d spoke into the ether it created bubbles. Those bubbles became stars.

Hey, it's just a theory.

5.56mm

73 posted on 02/09/2015 2:07:40 PM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mc5cents

There are some very good posts on this thread and they all appear to capture a similar understanding of the universe.

Every atom, snowflake and dust particle in the universe is a separate and unique entity. Nothing truly disappears, everything morphs or is absorbed into another form.

God’s creation is one continuing, moving miracle.


74 posted on 02/09/2015 2:08:02 PM PST by sodpoodle (Life is prickly - carry tweezers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: philoginist

Just ruminating - it certainly is not my doctoral thesis - that was eons ago on the subject of The Tupelo Gyrating Phenomenon.

kind thoughts
sod


75 posted on 02/09/2015 2:19:35 PM PST by sodpoodle (Life is prickly - carry tweezers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: tbpiper

This new view of the universe is brought to by the “Anything but God” school of COSMOTOLOGY................


76 posted on 02/09/2015 2:30:39 PM PST by Red Badger (If you compromise with evil, you just get more evil..........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

But.... I thought we’d detected the “background radiation” from the Big Bang. Was that lost while I wasn’t looking? (It could be - have been “busy” a lot for many years!)


77 posted on 02/09/2015 2:52:40 PM PST by Paul R. (Leftists desire to control everything; In the end they invariably control nothing worth a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Fred Hoyle is smiling somewhere.


78 posted on 02/09/2015 3:09:41 PM PST by Zeneta (Thoughts in time and out of season.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

This is just as ridiculous as global warming and maggots generating from pond scum. I heard a minister say that we are seeing the reversal of the Enlightenment. Science and the higher maths, critical thinking, etc. are returning to their alchemy and mystical past. When science doesn’t return the results its purveyors want or expected then they have “other ways” of getting them. “Oh, Gaia most high, give us global warming please! We’ve sacrificed 50 million babies and all America’s fossil fuels for you.” Remember... she was the daughter of chaos. That’s where we’re headed.


79 posted on 02/09/2015 3:10:01 PM PST by Lake Living
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

LOL! Thats a good one!


80 posted on 02/09/2015 4:10:29 PM PST by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson