Posted on 02/08/2015 7:23:42 AM PST by 9thLife
When future generations look back on the global-warming scare of the past 30 years, nothing will shock them more than the extent to which the official temperature records – on which the entire panic ultimately rested – were systematically “adjusted” to show the Earth as having warmed much more than the actual data justified. Two weeks ago, under the headline “How we are being tricked by flawed data on global warming”, I wrote about Paul Homewood, who, on his Notalotofpeopleknowthat blog, had checked the published temperature graphs for three weather stations in Paraguay against the temperatures that had originally been recorded. In each instance, the actual trend of 60 years of data had been dramatically reversed, so that a cooling trend was changed to one that showed a marked warming.
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
History will view the global warming hysteria like we view the Salem witch trials.
Climatological witchdoctors.
If, in fact, history ever has a chance to...
“History will view the global warming hysteria like we view the Salem witch trials.”
Obviously, because both were lead by thousands of scientist...Not!
After six years of Obama control, any statistical data from US or UN agencies is simply not credible.
That’s only because the witch scientists were not funded by the all knowing, all powerful central government.
Politics has corrupted science. The politicians and their buddies have made billions on the “Global Warming” fraud; i.e. Solyndra If I remember the spelling correctly.
99% of them? All over the world? Wow, that’s a mighty powerful “central government” you got there... Scary... Do you sleep much?
Whut?
If you send Al Gore (aka MANBEARPIG) 100 bucks today he will lower the seas 1 centimeter by next week.
Of course Barry will do it for free because he’s that kind of guy.
No, because both were promoted and supported as the truth by their respected leaders, the church leaders in Salem, and the scientific leaders of today. Both also perpetrated these lies for the same reason, power.
Which side of the globull warming thingy are you on?
Last month our first radical Islam President, put into office twice courtesy of Democrats, announced he was putting even more regulations on oil and gas companies to “curb methane output to offset climate change”.
What is the percentage of Methane in the earths atmosphere?
0.00017%
ZERO point ZERO ZERO ZERO
Environmentalist claims are found to be dishonest or exaggerated over and over again:
1)alar
2)asbestos
3)acid rain
4)dioxin
5)TCE in drinking water
6)chemicals in Love Canal
7)radiation at Three Mile Island
8)mercury poisoning in Lake Erie
9)chlorofluorocarbons destroying the ozone layer:
The reason for the dishonesty and exaggeration is that their claims are based neither on experiment nor on the concept of causality.Instead they rest on unsupported conjectures and wild leaps of imagination, from scintillas of fact to arbitrary conclusions, by means of evasion and the drawing or invalid inferences.
Pass me the Rain-Stick, will you?
We are being grubered.
Here is the UN recently admitting the reason for climate change is for global economic wealth distribution.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3255139/posts
The United Nation’s top climate change official Christiana Figueres announced this week that the group is actively working to “intentionally transform” the world’s economic development model, a task she called the “most difficult” one the group has ever undertaken.
“This is probably the most difficult task we have ever given ourselves, which is to intentionally transform the economic development model, for the first time in human history,” UNFCCC Executive Secretary Figueres stated at a press conference in Brussels Tuesday.
The “intentional” reordering of the global economy, she told reporters, “will not happen overnight” due to the “depth of the transformation”:
“This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the industrial revolution. That will not happen overnight and it will not happen at a single conference on climate change, be it COP 15, 21, 40 - you choose the number. It just does not occur like that. It is a process, because of the depth of the transformation.”
Can someone please explain why we are members of the UN?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.