This article is a misrepresentation of the facts of the case and ruling.
Key to the particulars is the fact that the driver CONSENTED to a search of his vehicle. Never consent to a search, even if you think you have nothing to hide.
I figured as much Zero Hedge is dodgy and the wise latina is always wrong. There must be more to the story that they are leaving out.
Supreme Court ruling threads on FR are a hoot. No one bothers to read the opinion before forming theirs. And to rely on some fake writer from ZeroHedge? LOL
Stories from Zero Hedge must be taken with a grain of salt. ZH presents everything as either a crisis, a conspiracy, or a mixture of both.
Key to the particulars is the fact that the driver CONSENTED to a search of his vehicle. Never consent to a search, even if you think you have nothing to hide.
Thank you for some perspective!
I figured as much Zero Hedge
Zero Hedge is the new DEBKAfile
Exactly
It’s old too.
About a month ago the same headline was posted here as breaking news and the misrepresentation had to be exposed.
The propagandists here are sickening.