I agree. It was interesting and pretty well balanced, I thought. Just documenting his personal journey. There were a few things that I had never heard of before. The show started about 15-20 minutes late for some reason, so after all the previews did not get going till near 8pm, so we did not stay for the panel discussion as it was after 10 and my wife gets up at 5am. Maybe the panel discussion will be available on youtube or something.
I was really surprised that he got those candid interviews with Netanyahu and Peres.
The worst part was that hokey interview with Michael Medved at the beginning. lol!
For others that might be interested in the movie.
http://www.patternsofevidence.com/media/filer_public/8f/87/8f8757a4-5f69-4d15-aa9c-548e2e0c1ee1/poe_epk_v9.pdf
My main complaint was the long lead-in, as I’ve been familiar with everything in this controv since, well, for 40 years now (that’s the surprise for today). It took forever to get started, and I got impatient. I didn’t expect the level of detail found in Velikovsky, or even in Rohl (like Peter James et al, authors of “Centuries of Darkness”, David Rohl came out of the failed Glasgow Chronology, which was dreamed up as a replacement for V’s reconstruction, in part because he was a Jew), and the intended audience would have gotten more out of that timeline virtual wall thing.