Posted on 01/04/2015 8:29:44 PM PST by Morgana
Pro-lifers spoke to abortionist Randall Whitney in his car. According to him, an aborted baby:
Would not have been a full baby It is not a being..It is not a baby. The baby is when its born, it is separate from its host [when the pro-lifer mentioned God] I grew up in the church Its not a human being
At this point the pro-lifer asked:
what is it, a frog?
Whitney laughed and said:
its a frog . I can kill a frog.
See full conversation below:
VIDEO AND PICTURE OF FROG ON LINK.
(Excerpt) Read more at clinicquotes.com ...
Only once you cut the cord, and Obama has said that even that act is not enough to grant life status to the infant if the mother didn't want it. Thus they make it clear that the issue is not about "women's bodies".
Whoever heard of a woman growing a second or third beating heart that just happens to coincide with pregnancy?
Left unborn by either disease, malnutrition or trauma the result nine months after conception will be a human being. It is not pro lifers who must prove the fetus is human. It is the pro abortion advocate who mufast prove the fetus is not human because reality says it is.
Unborn should be unbothered. Auto correct rots.
At tho moment of conception, an uniquely human life is created. That’s science.
Its up to the states, ultimately a states voters, to use their 10th Amendment-protected powers to decide what an unborn baby is. In fact, activist justices wrongly usurped state powers to politically amend the so-called right to have an abortion to the Constitution imo.
ahahah THANK YOU!!
The depths of depravity.
Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny.
One of the idiocies of late 19th century “understanding”.
Stalinists lie. ALWAYS
Isn’t an unborn baby frog a tadpole?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.