You are unfortunately falsely accusing anyone who disagrees with you of having bad motives and motives putting them in league with the very people they actually oppose. You also seem to disregard the First Amendment rights of free speech possessed by the women who are accusing Bill Cosby of rape. Do you want us to understand that you oppose their right of free speech.
Also let me remind you of something I’ve mentioned many times before in the other threads regarding the Bill Cosby rape allegations. In the Seventies I generally respected Bill Cosby for his comedy and his role on I Spy, until my concern was aroused by some of the cocktail waitresses with whom I worked. They also went to work at the Playboy Mansion. Afterwards, some of us were talking about Bill Cosby’s comedy when these gals made some upset faces and made some very disapproving remarks about our interest in Bill Cosby’s comedy. They refused to come out and give any specifics why they disliked Bill Cosby, but they did make it clear the one part of working at the Playboy Mansion was their dislike in being around Bill Cosby when he was hanging around there. In other words, thy made it very clear there was something exceptional and wrong enough to make them particularly uncomfortable in a way different from anyone else at the Playboy Mansion.
Now that was some 35 years ago, and here we are with women and men making the same comments about Bill Cosby putting on a Dr. Jekyll persona performance in public and a Mr. Hyde persona and performance in private. This incudes the trades people over the years who have complained about Bill Cosby treating them and his family with cruelty.
All of this goes far far beyond politics.
Butters is a conspiracy nut, not playing with a full deck, if you try to read her ravings, all of this is part of a large political conspiracy, and so are all the freepers who think that Cosby is probably a rapist, involved in the conspiracy.
And what evidence do you have of any of this? We don’t know you from jack, on an anonymous forum. You’ve claimed to be many different things, on this forum.
The Playboy stories are suspect. He coulda had Hefner get any gal he wanted, for him to do anything he wanted - no drugs necessary. Coulda done it all in the orgy room, or take them to his place, or whatever. Why, if the guy coulda had anything he wanted, would he drug women? Where is the thrill of the hunt in that? He could get the same thing with an inflate-a-woman.
Interesting that the loudest people on FR who have suspended skepticism on the factual issues involved in these stories all seem to have some kind of connection with the same Hollywood types who are ALSO paying no attention to the factual details.
The stories about the drugs are not fitting the descriptions of what various drugs actually do. And there are other discrepancies also.
I have no idea what kind of guy Cosby is. I suppose there are probably bar-maids who don’t like him. If they didn’t say why, it could be that he tips badly. Who knows? What I do know is that the stories themselves don’t pass muster.