Posted on 12/13/2014 6:38:10 PM PST by Seeing More Clearly Now
.... Di-Natale provided coverage of the [Osama bin Laden] raid's aftermath, including an exclusive interview with Shakil Afridi, the doctor who helped U.S. agents verify Bin Laden's presence, and who remains imprisoned in Pakistan to this day. Di-Natale notably reported from Osama bin Laden's Pakistan compound in the aftermath of the US raid, and is known for chiseling out a brick from the compound: Call me a conspiracy theorist, but when I heard about Di-Natale's death, the first thing that popped into my mind was this: Who killed him? It isn't that far-fetched to suspect foul play when a journalist who covered controversial stories suddenly dies. I can think of two notable examples immediately. One is Andrew Breitbart, who, at age 43 (the same age as Di-Natale), collapsed and died on the street in front of his house on March 1, 2012 – just hours before he was set to release damning video footage that could have destroyed Barack Obama's 2012 re-election campaign. And then there's the disturbing case of Michael Hastings, a journalist who died in a mysterious car crash on June 18, 2013. Hastings was preparing to publish a major investigative piece tied to the undercover agent who is suspected of sanitizing President Obama's passport records prior to the 2008 presidential election. He also was investigating abuses by the CIA and NSA. Hastings also wrote a piece about Bowe Bergdahl. He was able to convince fellow soldiers to speak upon conditions of anonymity while disobeying the "gag orders" of their superiors. That piece was published in Rolling Stone on June 7, 2012. The FBI was investigating Hastings. He died just hours after sending out an email warning friends about the agency's investigation....
(Excerpt) Read more at freedomoutpost.com ...
Does anyone else have trouble comprehending what is being meant here?
Once you “spring the news” you are no longer a valuable target and things could get complicated if your adversary offs you. Then because there is always a chance of the job going awry and coming back on the assassin. Once the news is out there is no reason to kill the bearer. Prevention is high value. Revenge is not. If Breitbart had kept his mouth shut until he made his revelations we would surely know a lot more about things than we finally learned.
The intel services can even put drops in your shoes that will poison you very slowly.
And poison is very sneaky. Many organic compounds break down naturally in the dead body, and are not traceable after the first few days. Unless the pathologist knows the exact poison suspected and test for it immediately, (out of thousands of compounds), it will never be traceable later on.
Murder is one of the easiest crimes for crooked intel agencies to carry out and get away with.
Insightful reply Travis. Thanks for sharing.
Are there poisons that cause gradual memory loss and confusion - mimicking onset of Alzheimers?
I would assume so. The CIA and military practices with LSD on our own troops in the early 1960s. The reason given even then was to cause mass confusion among enemy troops. Imagine how far we have gone in pharma and neuroscience since then.
Freepmail sent.
mark. thanks for the ping.
This matter should be looked into.
I note this bit: “Di-Natale notably reported from Osama bin Laden’s Pakistan compound in the aftermath of the US raid, and is known for chiseling out a brick from the compound ...”
There were many odd aspects to the story of Bin Laden’s death, and one of them is that afterward the entire house was demolished by the Pakistani govt. In grabbing this brick, the journalist may have been trying to get evidence, which was in the process of being taken away.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.