Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers
Your post 70 mentions a 2004 accusation. What year is it now?

Actually the drugging and raping took place in 2004, that wasn't 30 years ago and she went to the police in 2005, just as another victim from his show went to police in 2000, cases that were in the media and police hands, long before any Statute of Limitations expired.

The police buried the 2000 report on the powerful man, and the 2004 rape resulted in 13 women willing to testify and Cosby settling out of court and during this time Cosby threatened the media for covering these stories.

You must have been defending Clinton like crazy if you think that there is no evidence that Bill Cosby drugs women and is a serial rapist.

107 posted on 11/22/2014 10:55:04 AM PST by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12

In Arizona, the statute of limitations is 7 years. 7 + 2004 = 2011. The DA in that case said he didn’t have enough evidence to go to trial.

Any of the women in long term relationships could have gotten proof. If they were drugged and raped, they could have gone to the cops and the DNA and drug tests would have put Cosby behind bars. They did not.

My thoughts on Clinton were posted on FR back in 98 & 99. What are your thoughts on Anita Hill?


114 posted on 11/22/2014 12:14:57 PM PST by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson